Organization and person identity

Describe the organization and founder without invented authority.

Use separate business, person and profile records. Connect only the roles, identifiers and external references that the visible evidence supports.

Free learning from Semantec SEO.

A navy office model connected by an amber link to a cobalt founder portrait token.

Build the business and person records from supported facts.

Organization and Person descriptions should identify a real business and individual without manufacturing authority. Begin with the visible company record and the person’s approved profile. Keep the organization’s name, website and identifiers separate from the person’s name, role and biography. A founder is connected to a business; the founder is not the business.

For each proposed fact, record its controlling source, visible location, scope, date checked and reviewer. A company’s own approved records can support its identity and current contact routes; a professional qualification, legal registration or award needs the relevant evidence and permission to publish. A confident draft, a company name match or a template placeholder is not sufficient evidence.

The Organization definition and Person definition describe the available vocabulary. Their property lists are possible descriptions, not a requirement to fill every field. Omit unsupported optional data instead of inventing an impressive but unverifiable record.

Separate founding, employment, authorship and product creation.

An open blank identity record book beside a person card, navy magnifying glass and amber tabs.

A founding relationship is historical: a person or organization founded an organization. Current employment, a current job title and authorship of a particular work are different claims. A founder can leave a business, hold no current operational role or write only some of its articles. Review each relationship independently and preserve the time condition that makes it true.

The founder property belongs on the Organization and points to the Person or Organization that founded it. Putting founder on a Person and pointing to the business reverses that meaning. Use worksFor only when a current organizational relationship is supported; a founding statement alone does not establish it.

Authorship belongs to the work and references the person or organization responsible for that work. Product creation or ownership requires its own supported relationship. Do not infer that every article, software release or company statement was personally created by the founder. A profile can explain the person’s role without adding unverified awards, credentials, customer lists or performance claims.

Use organization identifiers with their exact scope.

Choose one accepted organization @id and reference it consistently. The public name and homepage help readers recognize the business, while a legal name, registration reference or other identifier can disambiguate it when that fact is appropriate, supported and permitted. A brand, legal company, local branch and product may require separate nodes rather than a single combined identity.

Use the field whose meaning fits the source. A registration number is not a phone number, a website address is not an organization identifier issued by a registry, and an @id chosen by the site is not proof of legal registration. Preserve the issuing system, jurisdiction or other necessary scope when an identifier would be ambiguous alone. Never create a plausible number to satisfy a field.

Check the approved contact route before adding telephone, email, address or contactPoint. Do not publish a private founder address or personal contact details merely because a search found them. A company operating online does not justify inventing a public office location. Keep volatile facts attached to a responsible company record and a review trigger.

Treat sameAs as an identity reference, not a recommendation.

A navy person model beside two navy profile cards and a cobalt card joined by amber chain links.
sameAs identifies a reference web page that unambiguously refers to the same item. A verified official external company profile may describe the same Organization. A verified founder profile may describe the Person. The company and founder must not share those references interchangeably.

A topical article, a service directory category, a customer, a founder’s employer or a prestigious publication is not automatically the same thing as the subject. A page can mention the person without being an identity reference. Confirm name, organization context and other disambiguating details, and the owner’s approved public identity routes, before inclusion.

Exclude uncertain matches and record the reason. A social profile’s follower count does not establish a credential, and sameAs is not an endorsement or a link-building device. If the profile changes ownership, disappears or begins describing another entity, reopen the identity reference rather than leaving a stale association.

Model a fictional agency and founder from a finite brief.

This example is entirely fictional and uses reserved example.com URLs. The stipulated company page says Example Agency is the organization’s public name, its homepage is https://example.com/, and Morgan Lee founded it. Morgan’s visible approved profile says Morgan is currently Director at Example Agency. The agency publishes that profile. No awards, legal registration, external identity profiles, customer results or qualifications are supplied.

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
      "@type": "Organization",
      "@id": "https://example.com/#organization",
      "name": "Example Agency",
      "url": "https://example.com/",
      "founder": {
        "@id": "https://example.com/people/morgan-lee/#person"
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Person",
      "@id": "https://example.com/people/morgan-lee/#person",
      "name": "Morgan Lee",
      "url": "https://example.com/people/morgan-lee/",
      "jobTitle": "Director",
      "worksFor": {
        "@id": "https://example.com/#organization"
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "ProfilePage",
      "@id": "https://example.com/people/morgan-lee/#webpage",
      "url": "https://example.com/people/morgan-lee/",
      "name": "Morgan Lee \u2014 founder and director",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@id": "https://example.com/people/morgan-lee/#person"
      },
      "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://example.com/#organization"
      }
    }
  ]
}

The Organization owns the founder relationship and references Morgan’s Person ID. The Person owns the current job title and worksFor relationship because this fictional brief explicitly supports them. The ProfilePage represents the document, references Morgan as mainEntity and identifies the agency as publisher. Different fragments keep the person and page distinct even though they share a profile URL.

No sameAs field is present because the brief supplies no verified external identity reference. No legalName, registration number, address, logo, award or educational credential is guessed. The example is a teaching candidate, not a live graph for a real business and not evidence of a search feature outcome.

Read the accepted and rejected facts side by side.

Fictional agency and founder evidence decisions
Proposed factStipulated sourceDecision and reasonReview trigger
Organization name and urlVisible company pageAccept Example Agency and its specified homepageRename, domain move or identity dispute
Organization.founder → MorganCompany record and approved profile agreeAccept founding relationship in the correct directionCorrection of founding history
Person jobTitle: DirectorApproved current profile explicitly says DirectorAccept current role; do not infer a qualificationRole or employment change
Person.worksFor → organizationSame current profile supports the relationshipAccept independently of founding historyDeparture or changed relationship
Organization legal identifierNo registry or approved legal record suppliedOmit; public name does not prove registration detailsPermitted authoritative record acquired
Person or organization sameAsNo external identity reference suppliedOmit; do not guess social accountsVerified approved identity page acquired
Award or qualificationNo evidence suppliedReject; authority cannot be created by markupGenuine relevant evidence and permission
Customer or ranking resultsNo study or customer permission suppliedReject; identity data does not establish outcomesSeparately reviewed evidence, if ever relevant

If Morgan later leaves the agency, founding can remain a supported historical relationship while the current worksFor and Director claims need removal or revision. If the agency changes its public name without changing identity, the accepted ID may remain while the label changes. A different legal entity or successor requires a separate identity review, not an automatic relabeling.

A real reviewer would check the current visible pages, source dates, permissions, identifiers and all data emitters. Parsing this fictional JSON confirms only its basic readability. It does not substitute for those factual and deployment checks.

Keep Semantec’s source identity context visible and bounded.

Reference cards showing a company building, a person, a wrench and a location pin around a magnifying glass and notebook.

The supplied Semantec source material identifies Kevin Maguire as founder of Semantec SEO and creator of MIRENA, and identifies Semantec SEO as publisher behind this site and MIRENA. Those are separate person, organization and product records. The Kevin Maguire profile is the named person source route retained for that context.

Keep those distinctions when reviewing identity descriptions: a product is not its publisher, and a founder’s profile is not an organization record. The supplied source excludes unverified qualifications, awards, follower counts, customer lists and performance promises. This educational example adds none of those claims and does not announce a new current product capability or commercial term.

If the current public records disagree about a role, name or relationship, hold the affected field and ask the responsible source owner to resolve it. Do not average conflicting biographies or choose whichever statement appears more authoritative. Stable identity requires consistent evidence as well as consistent strings.

Review the whole identity path before release.

Check syntax, term fit, relationship direction, page-versus-entity distinction, visible facts and final URLs. Inspect theme and plugin output for duplicate organization or person identities. A profile can be accurate while another template still emits an old role or a conflicting ID. Update affected references together and keep the change record.

Google’s structured data policies make accuracy and relevant visible content part of the review. A general vocabulary match or successful parse does not guarantee indexing, a knowledge panel, rankings or another search appearance. Check current platform requirements only for the specific feature being considered.

Use the structured data hub for the broader description and testing path. Return to the semantic SEO learning overview when source ownership, business identity or page purpose needs clarification. Keep one accountable reviewer for identity changes after release.