Compare Cluster Planning for SEO | MIRENA Evaluation Architecture
MIRENAby Semantec SEO
Menu

Topical Mapping · Evaluation architecture

How MIRENA plans comparison clusters without repeated pages and criteria.

Give MIRENA the comparison queries, competitors or categories, product and audience context, current compare pages, criteria, proof, and commercial routes. MIRENA decides which comparisons deserve pages, sections, or rejection and how the cluster works together.

See the MIRENA process Review Topical Maps with MIRENA
MIRENA internal workflow Static decision model Human approval required No ranking guarantee
Primary intentEvaluationThe reader is trying to choose.
Parent systemCompare hubThe hub groups the evaluation paths.
Page ruleDistinct decision pathA new page must earn a separate job.
Criteria ruleShared frame, tailored depthConsistency does not mean copied pages.

Planning problem

A compare cluster is a governed set of evaluation pages with one parent hub, distinct comparison jobs, shared criteria, page boundaries, evidence rules, and a clear action path.

The job is structural. MIRENA reviews ownership, intent, role, evidence, dependencies, routes, user progression, and downstream production before a decision is accepted.

Failure signal

Comparison pages launch one by one

The cluster has repeated intros, criteria, product explanations, and links.

Failure signal

Every competitor receives a URL

Thin or low value comparisons inflate the site.

Failure signal

Criteria change without control

Pages feel inconsistent or so rigid that every comparison sounds the same.

Boundary: MIRENA does not publish a comparison page from a brand name alone. The page needs distinct decision criteria, sufficient depth, evidence, clear ownership, and a route into the next action.

How MIRENA handles the work

The internal process moves from evidence into governed page and route decisions.

Inventory evaluation intent

Collect direct versus, alternatives, category, manual process, workflow, and tool type comparisons.

Define the compare hub

Give the evaluation lane one parent page and grouped routes.

Choose page or section treatment

Approve dedicated pages only when the decision path and depth are distinct.

Build the criteria framework

Set shared decision criteria and tailor them to the comparison type.

Set page boundaries

Separate each page by intent, audience, evidence, and action.

Map evidence and proof

Record product facts, process differences, limitations, pricing context, and source requirements.

Map internal and commercial routes

Connect the hub, comparisons, product, pricing, use cases, proof, and support.

Create the brief handoff

Pass criteria, claims, proof, exclusions, format, and action direction into the brief.

Decision record

MIRENA keeps the important fields visible through the handoff.

Decision field

Comparison type

Direct, alternatives, category, workflow, manual process, or tool type.

Decision field

Primary decision

The choice the reader must make.

Decision field

Criteria frame

The shared and page specific evaluation dimensions.

Decision field

Evidence need

The source required for each distinction.

Decision field

Page boundary

The difference from the hub and sibling comparisons.

Decision field

Next route

Product, pricing, use case, support, or hold.

Illustrative output

The record shows what MIRENA decided and where the work moves next.

The example shows structure only. It is not a client result, live audit, ranking claim, or automatic implementation.

Example MIRENA record
  • Comparison familyMIRENA versus plain AI chat
  • TreatmentDedicated category comparison
  • Shared criteriaStructure, repeatability, review, page relationships, output
  • Proof routeWorkflow and output documentation
  • Action routeMIRENA overview and pricing

Review states

MIRENA returns an owned decision instead of an unqualified recommendation.

Review statePass

The page owns a distinct decision with supported criteria.

Review stateRevise

The comparison fits but evidence or page boundaries are weak.

Review stateHold

Product facts, competitor evidence, or current pricing is unclear.

Review stateBlock

The proposed page repeats another comparison or makes unsupported claims.

Connected workflow

The work moves into the next page that owns the decision.

Intent

Intent to Page Mapping

Confirm evaluation intent and ownership.

Open the route
Navigate

Navigational Cluster Planning

Connect compare, product, and pricing destinations.

Open the route
Commercial

Commercial Spine Design

Place comparison inside the evaluation path.

Open the route
Evidence

Information Gain Prompts

Find repeated criteria and missing distinctions.

Open the route
Brief

Content Briefs

Turn criteria and proof into page instructions.

Open the route

Questions

Compare Cluster Planning for SEO questions.

What is a compare cluster?

It is a structured set of evaluation pages with a parent hub, clear page roles, shared criteria, and controlled routes.

Does every competitor deserve a page?

No. MIRENA chooses among dedicated page, section, broader comparison, alternatives page, merge, and rejection.

What makes a comparison page distinct?

It needs a different decision path, evidence set, criteria emphasis, depth, or action route.

How does MIRENA keep criteria consistent?

MIRENA uses a shared evaluation frame and adapts it to the comparison type without copying the same page.

What follows compare planning?

Approved pages enter evidence collection, intent led briefs, drafting, internal links, product, and pricing routes.

Next route

Give MIRENA the source context and working evidence. MIRENA returns the governed handoff.

The current Founder plan includes one seat and one active MIRENA instance for 30 days at €20 excluding VAT. OpenAI account rules and usage limits remain separate.

MIRENA output requires factual, editorial, legal, technical, and business review before publication or implementation.

Open MIRENA Review Founder access