One entity must lead the page
MIRENA separates the central entity from secondary and supporting concepts before it audits depth.
Entity depth review · Information Gain
MIRENA identifies the primary entity, maps the attributes and relationships a useful page should explain, compares the result set and current asset, then turns the missing depth into structure, evidence, internal routes, or page ownership.
Definition and research boundary
The review asks what defines the entity, how it works, what affects it, what it influences, where it fits, and which relationships the reader still cannot see.
MIRENA separates the central entity from secondary and supporting concepts before it audits depth.
A useful attribute explains function, constraint, fit, contrast, workflow, or connection to another entity.
The attribute moves into a block, section, example, comparison, question, internal link, sibling page, or hold.
MIRENA internal workflow
The workflow prevents loose terminology, random depth, repeated entity names, and missing relationships from becoming a thin brief.
MIRENA fixes the central entity, target query, audience, page role, source context, protected pages, and next workflow.
MIRENA lists definitions, properties, functions, constraints, inputs, outputs, examples, contrasts, edge cases, relationships, and workflow roles.
MIRENA records which attributes are common, shallow, missing, disconnected, repeated, or explained strongly.
Every attribute becomes covered, weak, vague, buried, missing, duplicated, owned elsewhere, or unsupported.
MIRENA assigns the gap to a definition, section, table, question, comparison, example, internal route, sibling page, rejection, or hold.
The approved attributes receive salience priority, source needs, section targets, formats, link routes, owners, and review conditions.
Eight attribute gap types
The page names the entity but skips the traits that define or qualify it.
The page does not explain what the entity does or why it matters.
Limits, poor fit, exceptions, and failure conditions remain absent.
The workflow lacks the material the entity needs or the result it creates.
Connected concepts appear without a clear explanation of how they interact.
The reader cannot distinguish the entity from a nearby alternative or weak version.
The concept stays abstract and does not expose real characteristics or use.
The page does not show where the entity appears, who uses it, or what happens next.
Eight audit dimensions
Does the page explain what the entity is beyond a short label?
Does the attribute support the search intent and page job?
Does the detail change understanding, fit, decision, application, or continuation?
Is the attribute shallow, absent, buried, repeated poorly, or disconnected across the field?
Is the attribute grounded in approved evidence, direct input, or a credible source?
Is the attribute primary, secondary, supporting, or better handled elsewhere?
Should the attribute appear in prose, a table, comparison, checklist, question, or example?
Does the current page own the detail or should it route to a sibling page?
Eight attribute treatments
Use when the primary entity lacks a clear working explanation.
Use when the attribute needs context but remains part of the same page job.
Use when properties, fit, limits, alternatives, or tradeoffs need contrast.
Use when strong and weak versions make the attribute concrete.
Use when the reader needs criteria, conditions, inputs, outputs, or review points.
Use when one follow up question exposes the missing depth.
Use when a sibling page already owns the deeper attribute or relationship.
Use when the attribute has distinct intent, enough depth, low overlap, and cluster value.
Examples
Entity salience is how important an entity is on a page.
Explain centrality through structure, proximity, heading hierarchy, repetition control, placement, and supporting relationships.
A topical map organizes pages around a topic.
Add cluster roles, page ownership, split and merge rules, build order, protected pages, and internal route logic.
Information gain means adding unique value.
Add baseline versus repetition, missing attributes, missing relationships, evidence, user gain, format, and handoff.
A brief tells a writer what to cover.
Add page job, entities, attributes, section roles, answer formats, proof notes, internal links, review gates, and downstream route.
Related workflows
Defines the thing a page is about.
Provides the foundation before attributes and relationships are audited.
Explains the properties and details that make an entity useful.
Supplies the candidate attribute network for the review.
Explains how entities connect and influence one another.
Repairs disconnected concepts and missing semantic bridges.
Prioritizes the entities and attributes that deserve the strongest placement.
Controls emphasis after the gap list is built.
Turns entity, attribute, placement, and link decisions into writer instructions.
Receives the approved attribute treatment plan.
Maps repeated and shallow entity coverage across the field.
Shows which attributes are baseline and which create useful depth.
Ownership and production decisions
The attribute strengthens the same answer and needs little extra structure.
The attribute needs a table, comparison, checklist, question, or example.
Another approved page already owns the deeper relationship or attribute.
The attribute has distinct intent, enough depth, low overlap, and clear cluster value.
Common mistakes
Naming the concept is only the start. Attributes make it understandable and useful.
Extra detail does not help when it misses the query, page role, or source context.
Primary, secondary, supporting, and routed attributes need different emphasis.
Frequency without new meaning creates shallow coverage.
The insight must become a section, component, link, brief, or rewrite action.
Some attributes belong on a sibling page and should be reinforced through an internal route.
MIRENA outputs
Page job, primary entity, supporting entities, source context, query, and salience role.
Review the routeProperties, functions, constraints, inputs, outputs, examples, contrasts, edge cases, relationships, and workflow roles.
Review the routeCoverage state, SERP weakness, relevance, evidence, salience, format, ownership, and priority.
Review the routeDefinition, section, table, question, checklist, comparison, example, link, sibling page, or hold.
Review the routeThe attribute becomes a section role, source requirement, format, example, link target, and instruction.
Review the routeAccepted, held, rejected, blocked, and review needed attributes receive owners and next workflows.
Review the routeQuestions
It is a missing property, function, constraint, relationship, example, contrast, edge case, input, output, or workflow role around a named entity.
Keyword gaps ask which words are missing. Entity attribute gaps ask which meaningful details and relationships remain underdeveloped.
No. Some belong in the current section, a dedicated component, an existing sibling, or a new planning route.
Yes. They can expose repeated entity names, shallow definitions, missing relationships, vague examples, and weak workflow context.
MIRENA checks query relevance, contextual value, result set weakness, source support, salience, format, and ownership.
MIRENA can return the primary entity record, attribute network, gap matrix, placement plan, brief or rewrite insertions, and final handoff.
Next route
Use the Information Gain prompt library for entity attributes, missing relationships, evidence, brief insertions, rewriting, internal routes, scoring, and final handoff.
Founder access is €20 per 30 days excluding VAT for one seat and one active MIRENA instance. OpenAI account rules and usage limits remain separate.