50 MIRENA source context and project control prompts for clean setup, clear gates, and safe handoff.
Source-context and project-control prompts define what the project is, what belongs, what is blocked, which pages are protected, which claims need proof, and which workflow can run next.
The complete inventory contains 12 master prompt packs and 38 single controls. Build the reusable project profile in the Source Context Template, then use this console to choose the smallest control module that fits the current job.
- 12 master prompt packs
- 38 single controls
- Five control phases
- Thirteen-point setup gate
MIRENA Project Control Console
Choose the current setup state, control job, asset, and desired route. The console selects one module, shows its prerequisites, builds the prompt, and records any stop condition.
The control layer should make the next safe decision easy to find.
The rebuild turns a long reading stream into a working console, a corrected fifty-module inventory, a searchable library, and a visible setup gate.
| Current friction | Rebuilt control | User result |
|---|---|---|
| Thirty in the title, fifty visible modules | One numbered 12-plus-38 inventory | Stable IDs, correct counts, and consistent exports |
| Quick-start routes after the full catalogue | Project Control Console in the first task view | The user starts from current state instead of scanning every prompt |
| No visible search or phase filters | Full-text search plus phase and module-type filters | One control can be found without reading the whole page |
| Setup controls and downstream work can blur | Explicit route-only handoff and schema timing | The page governs the work without starting the next workflow |
| Setup readiness is described but not scored | Thirteen-point gate with repair modules | Pass, revise, hold, or fail has a visible reason and route |
Setup moves from project identity to an approved handoff.
Master packs combine related setup checks. Single controls isolate one decision. Neither format may skip approval gates.
Foundation and topic boundaries
Build the source-context base and set the site boundary.
14 modules View this phase →Page queue and fit decisions
Score candidate work and record page, content-block, merge, hold, or reject decisions.
13 modules View this phase →Site protection and link rules
Protect page owners and define internal route controls.
7 modules View this phase →Proof, tone, and compliance
Control evidence, claims, voice, and compliance before writing.
6 modules View this phase →State, handoff, and setup QA
Preserve project state, route the next job, create the handoff, and pass setup QA.
10 modules View this phase →Thirteen setup checks decide if the project can enter handoff.
Core context fields control whether the project can continue at all. The remaining fields control page queues, links, proof, language, compliance, and the next route.
Project-control checklist
Mark only fields that have evidence and human-reviewed values.
Search all 50 project-control modules.
Each card contains the purpose, prerequisites, tasks, return fields, guardrails, short command, and expanded prompt.
01
MP01 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Source Context Setup Pack
Create the project control base before page discovery, mapping, briefing, rewriting, linking, or production begins.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Build the Source Context Profile.
- Define the site purpose, audience, offer, and target region.
- Rank the primary and secondary entity sets.
- Define allowed topic lanes, blocked topic lanes, and hard exclusions.
- Record internal link targets and approved proof sources.
- Choose the next setup route without creating page ideas.
Return fields
- source context profile
- site purpose
- audience
- offer
- target region
- primary entities
- secondary entities
- allowed topic lanes
- blocked topic lanes
- proof sources
- internal link targets
- blockers
- review-needed items
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Stop when the site purpose, audience, offer, or allowed topic lanes are unclear.
- Do not create a page queue.
- Do not create a topical map, brief, draft, rewrite, link map, information gain plan, SERP plan, or schema note.
Short command
Run Source Context Setup Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Source Context Setup Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Create the project control base before page discovery, mapping, briefing, rewriting, linking, or production begins.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Build the Source Context Profile.
2. Define the site purpose, audience, offer, and target region.
3. Rank the primary and secondary entity sets.
4. Define allowed topic lanes, blocked topic lanes, and hard exclusions.
5. Record internal link targets and approved proof sources.
6. Choose the next setup route without creating page ideas.
Return the result with these fields:
- source context profile
- site purpose
- audience
- offer
- target region
- primary entities
- secondary entities
- allowed topic lanes
- blocked topic lanes
- proof sources
- internal link targets
- blockers
- review-needed items
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Stop when the site purpose, audience, offer, or allowed topic lanes are unclear.
- Do not create a page queue.
- Do not create a topical map, brief, draft, rewrite, link map, information gain plan, SERP plan, or schema note.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
02
MP02 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Project Intake Pack
Classify supplied files, URLs, exports, notes, and previous MIRENA work before any weak input can drive the project.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Identify every supplied input.
- Classify each input by type, source quality, and likely use.
- Separate setup inputs from downstream production inputs.
- Flag missing files, conflicting records, stale material, and risky inputs.
- Mark each input keep, hold, ignore, or review.
- Recommend the safe processing order and next setup pack.
Return fields
- input name or label
- input type
- source quality
- setup value
- downstream value
- risk
- missing field
- keep, hold, ignore, or review
- recommended processing order
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not extract raw page ideas.
- Do not let an unverified or stale file override approved source context.
- Route each input before any downstream analysis begins.
Short command
Run Project Intake Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Project Intake Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Classify supplied files, URLs, exports, notes, and previous MIRENA work before any weak input can drive the project.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify every supplied input.
2. Classify each input by type, source quality, and likely use.
3. Separate setup inputs from downstream production inputs.
4. Flag missing files, conflicting records, stale material, and risky inputs.
5. Mark each input keep, hold, ignore, or review.
6. Recommend the safe processing order and next setup pack.
Return the result with these fields:
- input name or label
- input type
- source quality
- setup value
- downstream value
- risk
- missing field
- keep, hold, ignore, or review
- recommended processing order
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not extract raw page ideas.
- Do not let an unverified or stale file override approved source context.
- Route each input before any downstream analysis begins.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
03
MP03 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Topic Lane Control Pack
Set the project’s topical boundary before any proposed page can enter a map or publishing queue.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Define allowed topic lanes.
- Define blocked topic lanes.
- Define hard exclusions.
- Define adjacent-topic rules.
- Define page-versus-content-block rules.
- Define topic-drift warnings.
- Define the review route for uncertain topics.
Return fields
- allowed topic lane
- reason it belongs
- blocked topic lane
- reason it is blocked
- hard exclusion
- adjacent-topic rule
- page-versus-content-block rule
- drift warning
- review-needed topic
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not approve pages.
- Do not build the topical map.
- Treat uncertain adjacency as review-needed rather than silently expanding the site.
Short command
Run Topic Lane Control Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Topic Lane Control Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Set the project’s topical boundary before any proposed page can enter a map or publishing queue.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Define allowed topic lanes.
2. Define blocked topic lanes.
3. Define hard exclusions.
4. Define adjacent-topic rules.
5. Define page-versus-content-block rules.
6. Define topic-drift warnings.
7. Define the review route for uncertain topics.
Return the result with these fields:
- allowed topic lane
- reason it belongs
- blocked topic lane
- reason it is blocked
- hard exclusion
- adjacent-topic rule
- page-versus-content-block rule
- drift warning
- review-needed topic
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not approve pages.
- Do not build the topical map.
- Treat uncertain adjacency as review-needed rather than silently expanding the site.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
04
C01 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Source Context Profile
Create or repair the compact project profile that every later control check must use.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the site, offer, audience, region, entities, topic boundaries, page inventory, proof, and desired output.
- Mark missing and conflicting fields.
- Record the approval state.
Return fields
- profile field
- current value
- source
- status
- conflict
- missing value
- approval state
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not infer a business fact when the source is missing.
- Do not create page ideas.
Short command
Run Source Context Profile for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Source Context Profile for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Create or repair the compact project profile that every later control check must use.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the site, offer, audience, region, entities, topic boundaries, page inventory, proof, and desired output.
2. Mark missing and conflicting fields.
3. Record the approval state.
Return the result with these fields:
- profile field
- current value
- source
- status
- conflict
- missing value
- approval state
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not infer a business fact when the source is missing.
- Do not create page ideas.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
05
C02 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Site Purpose Definition
Give the site one clear role, value, and operating boundary.
Single control
Control tasks
- State what the site does.
- State what it does not do.
- Name the user outcome and project role.
- Flag competing or vague purposes.
Return fields
- site purpose
- primary user outcome
- included role
- excluded role
- conflict
- approval state
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not use a broad industry label as the purpose.
- Do not combine unrelated offers into one purpose.
Short command
Run Site Purpose Definition for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Site Purpose Definition for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Give the site one clear role, value, and operating boundary.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. State what the site does.
2. State what it does not do.
3. Name the user outcome and project role.
4. Flag competing or vague purposes.
Return the result with these fields:
- site purpose
- primary user outcome
- included role
- excluded role
- conflict
- approval state
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not use a broad industry label as the purpose.
- Do not combine unrelated offers into one purpose.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
06
C03 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Audience Definition
Define the primary audience by role, state, need, skill, and decision context.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the primary audience.
- Name optional secondary audiences.
- Record skill, buyer state, problem, and exclusion.
- Flag audience conflicts.
Return fields
- primary audience
- secondary audience
- user state
- skill level
- need
- excluded audience
- conflict
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Reject labels such as everyone, businesses, or marketers without a narrower state.
- Do not let a secondary audience displace the primary one.
Short command
Run Audience Definition for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Audience Definition for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Define the primary audience by role, state, need, skill, and decision context.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the primary audience.
2. Name optional secondary audiences.
3. Record skill, buyer state, problem, and exclusion.
4. Flag audience conflicts.
Return the result with these fields:
- primary audience
- secondary audience
- user state
- skill level
- need
- excluded audience
- conflict
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Reject labels such as everyone, businesses, or marketers without a narrower state.
- Do not let a secondary audience displace the primary one.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
07
C04 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Offer Definition
Define what the site sells, teaches, supports, or provides and the conditions attached to it.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the offer.
- Describe the user job and benefit.
- Record access, price model, conditions, and exclusions.
- Flag unsupported or conflicting offer claims.
Return fields
- offer name
- offer type
- user job
- benefit
- commercial model
- condition
- exclusion
- claim risk
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not turn a desired positioning claim into a verified fact.
- Keep platform, payment, and service boundaries explicit.
Short command
Run Offer Definition for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Offer Definition for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Define what the site sells, teaches, supports, or provides and the conditions attached to it.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the offer.
2. Describe the user job and benefit.
3. Record access, price model, conditions, and exclusions.
4. Flag unsupported or conflicting offer claims.
Return the result with these fields:
- offer name
- offer type
- user job
- benefit
- commercial model
- condition
- exclusion
- claim risk
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not turn a desired positioning claim into a verified fact.
- Keep platform, payment, and service boundaries explicit.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
08
C05 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Region Definition
Set geography, language, localization, spelling, availability, and regulatory context.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the target region and language.
- Record local availability and spelling rules.
- Record regulated or location-specific claims.
- Flag missing localization sources.
Return fields
- target region
- language
- spelling standard
- availability rule
- local proof need
- regulatory note
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not imply service in an unconfirmed region.
- Do not reuse local claims without current local evidence.
Short command
Run Region Definition for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Region Definition for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Set geography, language, localization, spelling, availability, and regulatory context.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the target region and language.
2. Record local availability and spelling rules.
3. Record regulated or location-specific claims.
4. Flag missing localization sources.
Return the result with these fields:
- target region
- language
- spelling standard
- availability rule
- local proof need
- regulatory note
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not imply service in an unconfirmed region.
- Do not reuse local claims without current local evidence.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
09
C06 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Primary Entity Set
Rank the entities that must lead the site and define the attributes that make each one relevant.
Single control
Control tasks
- Extract candidate entities.
- Rank the primary set.
- Attach defining attributes and approved relationships.
- Remove broad or off-context entities.
Return fields
- primary entity
- entity type
- weight
- defining attribute
- approved relationship
- excluded association
- source
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not promote a high-volume term when it weakens site identity.
- Keep each entity tied to a stated audience, offer, or workflow.
Short command
Run Primary Entity Set for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Primary Entity Set for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Rank the entities that must lead the site and define the attributes that make each one relevant.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Extract candidate entities.
2. Rank the primary set.
3. Attach defining attributes and approved relationships.
4. Remove broad or off-context entities.
Return the result with these fields:
- primary entity
- entity type
- weight
- defining attribute
- approved relationship
- excluded association
- source
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not promote a high-volume term when it weakens site identity.
- Keep each entity tied to a stated audience, offer, or workflow.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
10
C07 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Secondary Entity Set
Select supporting entities that add depth without competing with the primary entity stack.
Single control
Control tasks
- Extract related entities.
- Classify support, comparison, proof, and route roles.
- Attach each entity to a primary owner.
- Block dilution and redundant entity groups.
Return fields
- secondary entity
- role
- primary owner
- relationship
- page or content-block use
- dilution risk
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not add an entity because competitors mention it when it lacks project fit.
- Every secondary entity needs a primary owner.
Short command
Run Secondary Entity Set for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Secondary Entity Set for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Select supporting entities that add depth without competing with the primary entity stack.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Extract related entities.
2. Classify support, comparison, proof, and route roles.
3. Attach each entity to a primary owner.
4. Block dilution and redundant entity groups.
Return the result with these fields:
- secondary entity
- role
- primary owner
- relationship
- page or content-block use
- dilution risk
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not add an entity because competitors mention it when it lacks project fit.
- Every secondary entity needs a primary owner.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
11
C08 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Allowed Topic Lanes
Define the topic lanes that directly reinforce the approved site purpose, entities, audience, and workflows.
Single control
Control tasks
- List allowed lanes.
- State why each lane belongs.
- Name the likely page or cluster owner.
- Record review conditions for narrow exceptions.
Return fields
- allowed lane
- reason
- primary entity
- audience fit
- owner
- condition
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not treat broad industry relevance as sufficient fit.
- Keep allowed lanes specific enough to guide a page decision.
Short command
Run Allowed Topic Lanes for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Allowed Topic Lanes for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Define the topic lanes that directly reinforce the approved site purpose, entities, audience, and workflows.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List allowed lanes.
2. State why each lane belongs.
3. Name the likely page or cluster owner.
4. Record review conditions for narrow exceptions.
Return the result with these fields:
- allowed lane
- reason
- primary entity
- audience fit
- owner
- condition
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not treat broad industry relevance as sufficient fit.
- Keep allowed lanes specific enough to guide a page decision.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
12
C09 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Blocked Topic Lanes
Record topics that look adjacent but should not enter the site or current project.
Single control
Control tasks
- List blocked lanes.
- State the conflict with audience, offer, entity, workflow, or route.
- Name any existing page that should absorb a narrow subtopic.
- Set the review owner.
Return fields
- blocked lane
- reason
- conflicting entity or audience
- possible existing owner
- review owner
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not soften a confirmed boundary into an optional note.
- Do not block a topic without recording the reason.
Short command
Run Blocked Topic Lanes for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Blocked Topic Lanes for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Record topics that look adjacent but should not enter the site or current project.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List blocked lanes.
2. State the conflict with audience, offer, entity, workflow, or route.
3. Name any existing page that should absorb a narrow subtopic.
4. Set the review owner.
Return the result with these fields:
- blocked lane
- reason
- conflicting entity or audience
- possible existing owner
- review owner
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not soften a confirmed boundary into an optional note.
- Do not block a topic without recording the reason.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
13
C10 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Hard Exclusions
Set non-negotiable topic, claim, audience, privacy, legal, and workflow exclusions.
Single control
Control tasks
- List each hard exclusion.
- Classify its type.
- State the trigger and required action.
- Set the escalation or rejection rule.
Return fields
- hard exclusion
- type
- trigger
- reason
- required action
- escalation owner
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Hard exclusions override scores and commercial value.
- Do not proceed when the exclusion status is uncertain.
Short command
Run Hard Exclusions for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Hard Exclusions for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Set non-negotiable topic, claim, audience, privacy, legal, and workflow exclusions.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List each hard exclusion.
2. Classify its type.
3. State the trigger and required action.
4. Set the escalation or rejection rule.
Return the result with these fields:
- hard exclusion
- type
- trigger
- reason
- required action
- escalation owner
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Hard exclusions override scores and commercial value.
- Do not proceed when the exclusion status is uncertain.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
14
C11 · Foundation and topic boundaries
Adjacent Topic Rules
Decide when a related topic becomes a page, a content block, an internal link, a hold, or an exclusion.
Single control
Control tasks
- Identify the adjacent topic.
- Check entity, buyer, workflow, and link fit.
- Choose page, content block, link, hold, or block.
- Record the boundary condition.
Return fields
- adjacent topic
- fit finding
- decision
- existing owner
- boundary condition
- reason
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not approve adjacency from lexical similarity alone.
- A separate page needs a distinct user job and route.
Short command
Run Adjacent Topic Rules for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Adjacent Topic Rules for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Decide when a related topic becomes a page, a content block, an internal link, a hold, or an exclusion.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify the adjacent topic.
2. Check entity, buyer, workflow, and link fit.
3. Choose page, content block, link, hold, or block.
4. Record the boundary condition.
Return the result with these fields:
- adjacent topic
- fit finding
- decision
- existing owner
- boundary condition
- reason
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not approve adjacency from lexical similarity alone.
- A separate page needs a distinct user job and route.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
15
MP04 · Page queue and fit decisions
Page Queue Approval Pack
Review a proposed page queue and decide which ideas become pages, content blocks, merges, holds, or rejections.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Import the page queue without adding new items.
- Score each proposed page for source-context fit.
- Score buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
- Compare each proposal with existing page owners.
- Decide page, content block, merge, hold, or reject.
- Add rejection or revision notes.
- Route approved items without creating briefs or drafts.
Return fields
- proposed page
- target entity or topic
- source-context fit
- buyer fit
- workflow fit
- link fit
- differentiation fit
- page, content block, merge, hold, or reject
- reason
- required internal links
- next workflow route
Guardrails
- Do not expand the supplied page list unless the user asks for discovery.
- Do not create a brief or draft.
- A page decision must have one canonical owner and one reason.
Short command
Run Page Queue Approval Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Page Queue Approval Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Review a proposed page queue and decide which ideas become pages, content blocks, merges, holds, or rejections.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Import the page queue without adding new items.
2. Score each proposed page for source-context fit.
3. Score buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
4. Compare each proposal with existing page owners.
5. Decide page, content block, merge, hold, or reject.
6. Add rejection or revision notes.
7. Route approved items without creating briefs or drafts.
Return the result with these fields:
- proposed page
- target entity or topic
- source-context fit
- buyer fit
- workflow fit
- link fit
- differentiation fit
- page, content block, merge, hold, or reject
- reason
- required internal links
- next workflow route
Control rules:
- Do not expand the supplied page list unless the user asks for discovery.
- Do not create a brief or draft.
- A page decision must have one canonical owner and one reason.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
16
MP05 · Page queue and fit decisions
Guardrail Scoring Pack
Apply a repeatable scoring model to topics, pages, findings, or workflow requests before approval.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Score source-context, topic, and entity fit.
- Score buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
- Record proof support and drift risk.
- Record the evidence for every high or low score.
- Decide approve, revise, hold, or reject.
- Choose the next setup or downstream route.
Return fields
- item
- item type
- source-context score
- topic-fit score
- entity-fit score
- buyer-fit score
- workflow-fit score
- link-fit score
- differentiation score
- proof support
- drift risk
- approve, revise, hold, or reject
- reason
- next workflow route
Guardrails
- Do not approve an item with unclear source-context fit.
- Do not treat a score as proof of search performance.
- Hard exclusions and wrong-audience conflicts override a high total.
Short command
Run Guardrail Scoring Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Guardrail Scoring Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Apply a repeatable scoring model to topics, pages, findings, or workflow requests before approval.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Score source-context, topic, and entity fit.
2. Score buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
3. Record proof support and drift risk.
4. Record the evidence for every high or low score.
5. Decide approve, revise, hold, or reject.
6. Choose the next setup or downstream route.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- item type
- source-context score
- topic-fit score
- entity-fit score
- buyer-fit score
- workflow-fit score
- link-fit score
- differentiation score
- proof support
- drift risk
- approve, revise, hold, or reject
- reason
- next workflow route
Control rules:
- Do not approve an item with unclear source-context fit.
- Do not treat a score as proof of search performance.
- Hard exclusions and wrong-audience conflicts override a high total.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
17
C12 · Page queue and fit decisions
Page Queue Import
Load a proposed page list without altering, expanding, or prematurely approving it.
Single control
Control tasks
- Parse each supplied item.
- Preserve source labels and order.
- Normalize title, URL, topic, intent, and proposed role.
- Flag duplicates and malformed rows.
Return fields
- queue item ID
- original label
- normalized title
- URL
- topic
- intent
- proposed role
- duplicate flag
- input issue
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not add page ideas.
- Keep the original source and row identity.
Short command
Run Page Queue Import for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Page Queue Import for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Load a proposed page list without altering, expanding, or prematurely approving it.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Parse each supplied item.
2. Preserve source labels and order.
3. Normalize title, URL, topic, intent, and proposed role.
4. Flag duplicates and malformed rows.
Return the result with these fields:
- queue item ID
- original label
- normalized title
- URL
- topic
- intent
- proposed role
- duplicate flag
- input issue
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not add page ideas.
- Keep the original source and row identity.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
18
C13 · Page queue and fit decisions
Page Queue Scoring
Score every imported queue item against the approved project controls.
Single control
Control tasks
- Score source-context, buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
- Record evidence for each score.
- Flag hard exclusions, duplicates, proof gaps, and route gaps.
- Recommend a provisional decision.
Return fields
- queue item ID
- five fit scores
- evidence
- hard-stop flag
- duplicate flag
- proof gap
- route gap
- provisional decision
Guardrails
- Do not let the score override a hard exclusion.
- Do not approve a page without an owner and route.
Short command
Run Page Queue Scoring for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Page Queue Scoring for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Score every imported queue item against the approved project controls.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Score source-context, buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
2. Record evidence for each score.
3. Flag hard exclusions, duplicates, proof gaps, and route gaps.
4. Recommend a provisional decision.
Return the result with these fields:
- queue item ID
- five fit scores
- evidence
- hard-stop flag
- duplicate flag
- proof gap
- route gap
- provisional decision
Control rules:
- Do not let the score override a hard exclusion.
- Do not approve a page without an owner and route.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
19
C14 · Page queue and fit decisions
Page Approval Gate
Issue the human-controlled page, content-block, merge, hold, or reject decision.
Single control
Control tasks
- Review score evidence and stop conditions.
- Compare existing owners.
- Choose one decision.
- Record approver, reason, dependencies, and route.
Return fields
- item
- decision
- canonical owner
- reason
- approver
- dependency
- required change
- next workflow route
Guardrails
- Approval remains human-controlled.
- Do not create a brief or draft inside the gate.
Short command
Run Page Approval Gate for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Page Approval Gate for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Issue the human-controlled page, content-block, merge, hold, or reject decision.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Review score evidence and stop conditions.
2. Compare existing owners.
3. Choose one decision.
4. Record approver, reason, dependencies, and route.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- decision
- canonical owner
- reason
- approver
- dependency
- required change
- next workflow route
Control rules:
- Approval remains human-controlled.
- Do not create a brief or draft inside the gate.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
20
C15 · Page queue and fit decisions
Page Rejection Notes
Create a reusable record explaining why a proposed page was rejected, merged, or held.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the rejected or held item.
- Record the failing control and evidence.
- Name the existing owner or blocked lane.
- State what would need to change for review.
Return fields
- item
- decision
- failed control
- evidence
- existing owner
- blocked lane
- revision condition
- review date or owner
Guardrails
- Do not hide the rejection reason.
- Do not recycle the same idea under a new title without resolving the cause.
Short command
Run Page Rejection Notes for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Page Rejection Notes for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Create a reusable record explaining why a proposed page was rejected, merged, or held.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the rejected or held item.
2. Record the failing control and evidence.
3. Name the existing owner or blocked lane.
4. State what would need to change for review.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- decision
- failed control
- evidence
- existing owner
- blocked lane
- revision condition
- review date or owner
Control rules:
- Do not hide the rejection reason.
- Do not recycle the same idea under a new title without resolving the cause.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
21
C16 · Page queue and fit decisions
Page vs Section Guard
Decide if a user need warrants its own URL or belongs inside an existing page.
Single control
Control tasks
- Compare intent, user task, owner, proof, format, and next route.
- Check search-result and current-site overlap.
- Choose page, content block, FAQ, table, merge, or hold.
- Record the canonical owner.
Return fields
- topic or query
- distinct user task
- existing owner
- overlap finding
- recommended form
- canonical owner
- reason
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Minor wording differences do not justify separate URLs.
- A new page needs a distinct job, owner, and route.
Short command
Run Page vs Section Guard for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Page vs Section Guard for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Decide if a user need warrants its own URL or belongs inside an existing page.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Compare intent, user task, owner, proof, format, and next route.
2. Check search-result and current-site overlap.
3. Choose page, content block, FAQ, table, merge, or hold.
4. Record the canonical owner.
Return the result with these fields:
- topic or query
- distinct user task
- existing owner
- overlap finding
- recommended form
- canonical owner
- reason
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Minor wording differences do not justify separate URLs.
- A new page needs a distinct job, owner, and route.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
22
C17 · Page queue and fit decisions
Topic Drift Check
Detect when a proposed item moves outside the approved entity, audience, offer, or workflow boundary.
Single control
Control tasks
- Compare the item with allowed, blocked, and adjacent lanes.
- Check entity and buyer displacement.
- Measure route and owner clarity.
- Return pass, revise, hold, or block.
Return fields
- item
- approved lane
- drift signal
- displaced entity or audience
- route issue
- decision
- reason
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not treat query volume as permission to drift.
- Hard exclusions return block.
Short command
Run Topic Drift Check for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Topic Drift Check for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Detect when a proposed item moves outside the approved entity, audience, offer, or workflow boundary.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Compare the item with allowed, blocked, and adjacent lanes.
2. Check entity and buyer displacement.
3. Measure route and owner clarity.
4. Return pass, revise, hold, or block.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- approved lane
- drift signal
- displaced entity or audience
- route issue
- decision
- reason
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not treat query volume as permission to drift.
- Hard exclusions return block.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
23
C18 · Page queue and fit decisions
Buyer Fit Check
Test if the proposed page serves a real need for the approved audience before, during, or after the offer.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the target audience and user state.
- State the page’s buyer or support job.
- Check the conversion or support route.
- Flag broad, low-quality, or wrong-audience demand.
Return fields
- item
- target audience
- user state
- buyer job
- fit score
- route
- wrong-audience flag
- reason
Guardrails
- Traffic potential alone does not prove buyer fit.
- Do not use a broad audience label.
Short command
Run Buyer Fit Check for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Buyer Fit Check for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Test if the proposed page serves a real need for the approved audience before, during, or after the offer.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the target audience and user state.
2. State the page’s buyer or support job.
3. Check the conversion or support route.
4. Flag broad, low-quality, or wrong-audience demand.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- target audience
- user state
- buyer job
- fit score
- route
- wrong-audience flag
- reason
Control rules:
- Traffic potential alone does not prove buyer fit.
- Do not use a broad audience label.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
24
C19 · Page queue and fit decisions
Workflow Fit Check
Test whether a page or task connects to an approved MIRENA output, offer, support path, or workflow stage.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the workflow or offer connection.
- State the input and expected downstream output.
- Check handoff feasibility.
- Return fit, revise, hold, or reject.
Return fields
- item
- workflow connection
- input
- expected output
- handoff feasibility
- fit score
- decision
- reason
Guardrails
- Do not invent a workflow connection.
- Do not execute the downstream task.
Short command
Run Workflow Fit Check for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Workflow Fit Check for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Test whether a page or task connects to an approved MIRENA output, offer, support path, or workflow stage.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the workflow or offer connection.
2. State the input and expected downstream output.
3. Check handoff feasibility.
4. Return fit, revise, hold, or reject.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- workflow connection
- input
- expected output
- handoff feasibility
- fit score
- decision
- reason
Control rules:
- Do not invent a workflow connection.
- Do not execute the downstream task.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
25
C20 · Page queue and fit decisions
Link Fit Check
Test whether a page strengthens a meaningful parent, sibling, proof, support, or next-step route.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the parent or hub.
- Name likely inbound sources.
- Name useful outbound destinations.
- Check orphan, circular, and forced-link risk.
Return fields
- item
- parent or hub
- inbound sources
- outbound targets
- link purpose
- orphan risk
- fit score
- decision
Guardrails
- Do not approve a page with no defensible route.
- Do not use internal links only to move authority.
Short command
Run Link Fit Check for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Link Fit Check for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Test whether a page strengthens a meaningful parent, sibling, proof, support, or next-step route.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the parent or hub.
2. Name likely inbound sources.
3. Name useful outbound destinations.
4. Check orphan, circular, and forced-link risk.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- parent or hub
- inbound sources
- outbound targets
- link purpose
- orphan risk
- fit score
- decision
Control rules:
- Do not approve a page with no defensible route.
- Do not use internal links only to move authority.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
26
C21 · Page queue and fit decisions
Differentiation Fit Check
Test if the item can add useful proof, a decision model, first-hand detail, or a missing relationship.
Single control
Control tasks
- Identify repeated result-set or existing-site coverage.
- Name the proposed information gain.
- Check proof feasibility.
- Choose approve, revise, merge, hold, or reject.
Return fields
- item
- repeated coverage
- new relationship or evidence
- proof feasibility
- differentiation score
- decision
- reason
- next workflow route
Guardrails
- A new title is not information gain.
- Do not approve a distinction that lacks proof or user value.
Short command
Run Differentiation Fit Check for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Differentiation Fit Check for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Test if the item can add useful proof, a decision model, first-hand detail, or a missing relationship.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify repeated result-set or existing-site coverage.
2. Name the proposed information gain.
3. Check proof feasibility.
4. Choose approve, revise, merge, hold, or reject.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- repeated coverage
- new relationship or evidence
- proof feasibility
- differentiation score
- decision
- reason
- next workflow route
Control rules:
- A new title is not information gain.
- Do not approve a distinction that lacks proof or user value.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
27
C22 · Page queue and fit decisions
Focus Score
Rate how strongly the project, cluster, or queue reinforces the approved site purpose and entity hierarchy.
Single control
Control tasks
- Score purpose alignment, entity concentration, lane discipline, buyer clarity, route clarity, and dilution risk.
- List the items lowering focus.
- Recommend keep, repair, merge, hold, or block actions.
Return fields
- focus score
- purpose alignment
- entity concentration
- lane discipline
- buyer clarity
- route clarity
- dilution risk
- repair action
Guardrails
- Do not use one score to hide conflicting evidence.
- Report the factors and items behind the total.
Short command
Run Focus Score for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Focus Score for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Rate how strongly the project, cluster, or queue reinforces the approved site purpose and entity hierarchy.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Score purpose alignment, entity concentration, lane discipline, buyer clarity, route clarity, and dilution risk.
2. List the items lowering focus.
3. Recommend keep, repair, merge, hold, or block actions.
Return the result with these fields:
- focus score
- purpose alignment
- entity concentration
- lane discipline
- buyer clarity
- route clarity
- dilution risk
- repair action
Control rules:
- Do not use one score to hide conflicting evidence.
- Report the factors and items behind the total.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
28
MP06 · Site protection and link rules
Internal Link Control Pack
Set page-role, target, anchor, commercial-route, and orphan-risk rules before downstream link work begins.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Identify priority link targets and protected pages.
- Define hub, support, proof, and commercial routes.
- Define preferred anchors and anchors to avoid.
- Define source-page and destination-page rules.
- Flag orphan risks and broken route assumptions.
- Route link rules into the selected downstream workflow.
Return fields
- priority target page
- page role
- link purpose
- preferred anchor
- anchors to avoid
- source page type
- destination page type
- commercial route
- orphan risk
- next workflow route
Guardrails
- Do not build the full internal link map.
- Do not force a link where the user path or entity relationship is weak.
- Keep protected-page ownership visible.
Short command
Run Internal Link Control Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Internal Link Control Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Set page-role, target, anchor, commercial-route, and orphan-risk rules before downstream link work begins.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify priority link targets and protected pages.
2. Define hub, support, proof, and commercial routes.
3. Define preferred anchors and anchors to avoid.
4. Define source-page and destination-page rules.
5. Flag orphan risks and broken route assumptions.
6. Route link rules into the selected downstream workflow.
Return the result with these fields:
- priority target page
- page role
- link purpose
- preferred anchor
- anchors to avoid
- source page type
- destination page type
- commercial route
- orphan risk
- next workflow route
Control rules:
- Do not build the full internal link map.
- Do not force a link where the user path or entity relationship is weak.
- Keep protected-page ownership visible.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
29
C23 · Site protection and link rules
Protected Pages
Record pages whose ownership, intent, links, proof, or conversion role must not be damaged by new work.
Single control
Control tasks
- List protected URLs.
- Record page role, owned intent, primary entity, critical links, and protected elements.
- Name changes that require review.
Return fields
- protected URL
- page role
- owned intent
- primary entity
- protected links
- protected element
- change requiring review
- owner
Guardrails
- Do not merge or rewrite a protected page without an explicit decision.
- Keep the canonical owner visible in page-queue review.
Short command
Run Protected Pages for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Protected Pages for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Record pages whose ownership, intent, links, proof, or conversion role must not be damaged by new work.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List protected URLs.
2. Record page role, owned intent, primary entity, critical links, and protected elements.
3. Name changes that require review.
Return the result with these fields:
- protected URL
- page role
- owned intent
- primary entity
- protected links
- protected element
- change requiring review
- owner
Control rules:
- Do not merge or rewrite a protected page without an explicit decision.
- Keep the canonical owner visible in page-queue review.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
30
C24 · Site protection and link rules
Pages to Rewrite
Mark existing pages that keep their URL but need structural, intent, proof, entity, link, or conversion repairs.
Single control
Control tasks
- List rewrite candidates.
- Record the retained owner and URL.
- Name the repair reasons and protected elements.
- Choose rewrite priority and route.
Return fields
- URL
- current role
- retained owner
- repair reason
- protected element
- priority
- rewrite route
- approval state
Guardrails
- Do not rewrite before the owner and keep/remove decisions are approved.
- Do not change a page role silently.
Short command
Run Pages to Rewrite for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Pages to Rewrite for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Mark existing pages that keep their URL but need structural, intent, proof, entity, link, or conversion repairs.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List rewrite candidates.
2. Record the retained owner and URL.
3. Name the repair reasons and protected elements.
4. Choose rewrite priority and route.
Return the result with these fields:
- URL
- current role
- retained owner
- repair reason
- protected element
- priority
- rewrite route
- approval state
Control rules:
- Do not rewrite before the owner and keep/remove decisions are approved.
- Do not change a page role silently.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
31
C25 · Site protection and link rules
Pages to Merge
Record overlapping pages that should be combined under one canonical owner.
Single control
Control tasks
- List source and destination URLs.
- Compare intent, entities, proof, links, and performance evidence.
- Choose the canonical owner.
- Record content, redirect, and link-transfer requirements.
Return fields
- source URL
- destination URL
- overlap reason
- canonical owner
- content to keep
- redirect need
- link transfer
- approval state
Guardrails
- Do not merge different user jobs into one mixed-intent page.
- Do not remove a URL until redirect and link consequences are reviewed.
Short command
Run Pages to Merge for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Pages to Merge for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Record overlapping pages that should be combined under one canonical owner.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List source and destination URLs.
2. Compare intent, entities, proof, links, and performance evidence.
3. Choose the canonical owner.
4. Record content, redirect, and link-transfer requirements.
Return the result with these fields:
- source URL
- destination URL
- overlap reason
- canonical owner
- content to keep
- redirect need
- link transfer
- approval state
Control rules:
- Do not merge different user jobs into one mixed-intent page.
- Do not remove a URL until redirect and link consequences are reviewed.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
32
C26 · Site protection and link rules
Pages to Block
Record page ideas or URLs that must not enter the current site, map, brief, or production queue.
Single control
Control tasks
- List the blocked page or idea.
- Name the hard boundary or failed fit check.
- Record any existing owner or off-site route.
- Set the review condition.
Return fields
- blocked item
- blocked URL
- failed control
- reason
- existing owner
- off-site route
- review condition
- owner
Guardrails
- Do not disguise a blocked idea under a new title.
- Do not delete a live page without technical and editorial review.
Short command
Run Pages to Block for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Pages to Block for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Record page ideas or URLs that must not enter the current site, map, brief, or production queue.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List the blocked page or idea.
2. Name the hard boundary or failed fit check.
3. Record any existing owner or off-site route.
4. Set the review condition.
Return the result with these fields:
- blocked item
- blocked URL
- failed control
- reason
- existing owner
- off-site route
- review condition
- owner
Control rules:
- Do not disguise a blocked idea under a new title.
- Do not delete a live page without technical and editorial review.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
33
C27 · Site protection and link rules
Internal Link Targets
Create the approved list of pages that downstream maps, briefs, and rewrites should support.
Single control
Control tasks
- List destination URLs.
- Record role, entity, user need, route purpose, priority, and source-page types.
- Flag missing or unsuitable destinations.
Return fields
- target URL
- page role
- entity
- user need
- link purpose
- priority
- source-page type
- missing-destination flag
Guardrails
- Do not add a destination that conflicts with page ownership.
- Do not use generic route descriptions.
Short command
Run Internal Link Targets for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Internal Link Targets for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Create the approved list of pages that downstream maps, briefs, and rewrites should support.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List destination URLs.
2. Record role, entity, user need, route purpose, priority, and source-page types.
3. Flag missing or unsuitable destinations.
Return the result with these fields:
- target URL
- page role
- entity
- user need
- link purpose
- priority
- source-page type
- missing-destination flag
Control rules:
- Do not add a destination that conflicts with page ownership.
- Do not use generic route descriptions.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
34
C28 · Site protection and link rules
Anchor Rules
Set truthful, varied, entity-aware anchor rules for approved internal routes.
Single control
Control tasks
- Define preferred anchor patterns.
- Define anchors to avoid.
- Map anchors to intent and destination role.
- Set repetition and placement rules.
Return fields
- destination
- preferred anchor
- alternate anchor
- intent
- anchor to avoid
- placement rule
- repetition rule
- review note
Guardrails
- Do not use anchors that promise a page does not deliver.
- Avoid generic anchors when a specific destination can be named.
Short command
Run Anchor Rules for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Anchor Rules for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Set truthful, varied, entity-aware anchor rules for approved internal routes.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Define preferred anchor patterns.
2. Define anchors to avoid.
3. Map anchors to intent and destination role.
4. Set repetition and placement rules.
Return the result with these fields:
- destination
- preferred anchor
- alternate anchor
- intent
- anchor to avoid
- placement rule
- repetition rule
- review note
Control rules:
- Do not use anchors that promise a page does not deliver.
- Avoid generic anchors when a specific destination can be named.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
35
MP07 · Proof, tone, and compliance
Proof and Evidence Control Pack
Define approved evidence, unsupported claim rules, first-hand input needs, and proof gaps before production.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Identify approved and missing proof sources.
- Identify claims that need support.
- Identify claims to avoid.
- Define first-hand input and example needs.
- Define evidence-quality and citation rules.
- Route the proof record into the next approved workflow.
Return fields
- approved proof source
- missing proof source
- claim type
- support needed
- claim to avoid
- first-hand input need
- example source
- evidence rule
- risk
- next workflow route
Guardrails
- Do not invent proof.
- Do not move unsupported claims into a brief or draft.
- Mark time-sensitive facts for current-source review.
Short command
Run Proof and Evidence Control Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Proof and Evidence Control Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Define approved evidence, unsupported claim rules, first-hand input needs, and proof gaps before production.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify approved and missing proof sources.
2. Identify claims that need support.
3. Identify claims to avoid.
4. Define first-hand input and example needs.
5. Define evidence-quality and citation rules.
6. Route the proof record into the next approved workflow.
Return the result with these fields:
- approved proof source
- missing proof source
- claim type
- support needed
- claim to avoid
- first-hand input need
- example source
- evidence rule
- risk
- next workflow route
Control rules:
- Do not invent proof.
- Do not move unsupported claims into a brief or draft.
- Mark time-sensitive facts for current-source review.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
36
MP08 · Proof, tone, and compliance
Tone and Compliance Control Pack
Set voice, reader tone, allowed wording, blocked wording, claims style, and legal or compliance notes before writing starts.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Define the brand voice and reader tone.
- Define allowed and blocked wording.
- Define claims style and risk language.
- Record legal, regulatory, accessibility, and editorial notes.
- Define rewrite rules for non-compliant language.
- Route the language controls into the next approved workflow.
Return fields
- brand voice rule
- reader tone rule
- allowed phrase
- blocked phrase
- claims-style rule
- compliance note
- risk note
- rewrite rule
- next workflow route
Guardrails
- Do not create the page copy.
- Do not let tone rules override source context or factual accuracy.
- Separate hard restrictions from editorial preferences.
Short command
Run Tone and Compliance Control Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Tone and Compliance Control Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Set voice, reader tone, allowed wording, blocked wording, claims style, and legal or compliance notes before writing starts.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Define the brand voice and reader tone.
2. Define allowed and blocked wording.
3. Define claims style and risk language.
4. Record legal, regulatory, accessibility, and editorial notes.
5. Define rewrite rules for non-compliant language.
6. Route the language controls into the next approved workflow.
Return the result with these fields:
- brand voice rule
- reader tone rule
- allowed phrase
- blocked phrase
- claims-style rule
- compliance note
- risk note
- rewrite rule
- next workflow route
Control rules:
- Do not create the page copy.
- Do not let tone rules override source context or factual accuracy.
- Separate hard restrictions from editorial preferences.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
37
C29 · Proof, tone, and compliance
Proof Source Inventory
Record the evidence sources available to support claims, comparisons, examples, and first-hand observations.
Single control
Control tasks
- List each source.
- Classify source type, owner, date, scope, reliability, and claim support.
- Mark current, stale, missing, restricted, or review-needed.
Return fields
- source label
- source type
- owner
- date
- supported claim
- scope
- quality
- status
- restriction
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not treat a competitor claim as independent proof.
- Mark time-sensitive evidence for current review.
Short command
Run Proof Source Inventory for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Proof Source Inventory for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Record the evidence sources available to support claims, comparisons, examples, and first-hand observations.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List each source.
2. Classify source type, owner, date, scope, reliability, and claim support.
3. Mark current, stale, missing, restricted, or review-needed.
Return the result with these fields:
- source label
- source type
- owner
- date
- supported claim
- scope
- quality
- status
- restriction
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not treat a competitor claim as independent proof.
- Mark time-sensitive evidence for current review.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
38
C30 · Proof, tone, and compliance
Claims Guard
Control which factual, comparative, commercial, legal, and performance claims can enter later work.
Single control
Control tasks
- List proposed claims.
- Map each claim to evidence.
- Classify approved, qualified, unsupported, prohibited, or time-sensitive.
- Write the safe wording rule.
Return fields
- claim
- claim type
- evidence
- status
- qualification
- prohibited wording
- safe wording rule
- review owner
Guardrails
- No ranking, traffic, lead, sale, or rich-result guarantee.
- Unsupported claims remain blocked.
Short command
Run Claims Guard for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Claims Guard for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Control which factual, comparative, commercial, legal, and performance claims can enter later work.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List proposed claims.
2. Map each claim to evidence.
3. Classify approved, qualified, unsupported, prohibited, or time-sensitive.
4. Write the safe wording rule.
Return the result with these fields:
- claim
- claim type
- evidence
- status
- qualification
- prohibited wording
- safe wording rule
- review owner
Control rules:
- No ranking, traffic, lead, sale, or rich-result guarantee.
- Unsupported claims remain blocked.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
39
C31 · Proof, tone, and compliance
Tone Rules
Set the voice, sentence style, reading level, preferred vocabulary, blocked wording, and CTA style.
Single control
Control tasks
- Define the brand voice and reader relationship.
- Set sentence and paragraph rules.
- List preferred and blocked terms.
- Define CTA and correction rules.
Return fields
- voice rule
- reader relationship
- sentence rule
- reading level
- preferred term
- blocked term
- CTA rule
- rewrite rule
Guardrails
- Tone does not override factual precision or accessibility.
- Separate hard blocks from style preferences.
Short command
Run Tone Rules for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Tone Rules for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Set the voice, sentence style, reading level, preferred vocabulary, blocked wording, and CTA style.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Define the brand voice and reader relationship.
2. Set sentence and paragraph rules.
3. List preferred and blocked terms.
4. Define CTA and correction rules.
Return the result with these fields:
- voice rule
- reader relationship
- sentence rule
- reading level
- preferred term
- blocked term
- CTA rule
- rewrite rule
Control rules:
- Tone does not override factual precision or accessibility.
- Separate hard blocks from style preferences.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
40
C32 · Proof, tone, and compliance
Compliance Notes
Record legal, privacy, accessibility, regulatory, platform, and editorial conditions that affect the project.
Single control
Control tasks
- List each condition.
- Name the affected page types and claims.
- Record required review, source, owner, and stop condition.
- Set the update trigger.
Return fields
- condition
- affected asset
- required review
- required source
- owner
- stop condition
- update trigger
- approval state
Guardrails
- Do not present this control record as legal advice.
- A missing required review remains a blocker.
Short command
Run Compliance Notes for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Compliance Notes for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Record legal, privacy, accessibility, regulatory, platform, and editorial conditions that affect the project.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. List each condition.
2. Name the affected page types and claims.
3. Record required review, source, owner, and stop condition.
4. Set the update trigger.
Return the result with these fields:
- condition
- affected asset
- required review
- required source
- owner
- stop condition
- update trigger
- approval state
Control rules:
- Do not present this control record as legal advice.
- A missing required review remains a blocker.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
41
MP09 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Workflow Routing Pack
Route approved inputs, pages, topics, or findings to the correct MIRENA workflow without starting that work.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Identify the item and its current state.
- Check source-context and approval status.
- Choose one route from the approved route list.
- Record the reason, blocker, and required input.
- Assign the next owner or action.
- Prepare a handoff note.
Return fields
- item
- item type
- current state
- source-context fit
- route
- reason
- blocker
- required input
- owner or next action
- handoff note
Guardrails
- Only route the work.
- Do not execute the selected downstream workflow.
- Schema cues remain blocked until visible copy has human approval.
Short command
Run Workflow Routing Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Workflow Routing Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Route approved inputs, pages, topics, or findings to the correct MIRENA workflow without starting that work.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify the item and its current state.
2. Check source-context and approval status.
3. Choose one route from the approved route list.
4. Record the reason, blocker, and required input.
5. Assign the next owner or action.
6. Prepare a handoff note.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- item type
- current state
- source-context fit
- route
- reason
- blocker
- required input
- owner or next action
- handoff note
Control rules:
- Only route the work.
- Do not execute the selected downstream workflow.
- Schema cues remain blocked until visible copy has human approval.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
42
MP10 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Local Context File Pack
Create a portable plain-text project-state record for later sessions, team handoff, or local archiving.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Record project identity, site purpose, audience, offer, region, and primary entities.
- Record allowed and blocked topic lanes.
- Record page-queue state and protected pages.
- Record proof, link, tone, and compliance rules.
- Record approved decisions, open blockers, and current route.
- Create a copy-ready restart block.
Return fields
- project identity
- source-context summary
- topic-boundary summary
- page-queue state
- protected-page state
- proof and link controls
- tone and compliance controls
- approved decisions
- open blockers
- current workflow route
- restart block
Guardrails
- Do not include passwords, payment data, or restricted client material.
- Mark unresolved decisions as pending rather than silently treating them as approved.
- Do not start the next workflow.
Short command
Run Local Context File Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Local Context File Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Create a portable plain-text project-state record for later sessions, team handoff, or local archiving.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Record project identity, site purpose, audience, offer, region, and primary entities.
2. Record allowed and blocked topic lanes.
3. Record page-queue state and protected pages.
4. Record proof, link, tone, and compliance rules.
5. Record approved decisions, open blockers, and current route.
6. Create a copy-ready restart block.
Return the result with these fields:
- project identity
- source-context summary
- topic-boundary summary
- page-queue state
- protected-page state
- proof and link controls
- tone and compliance controls
- approved decisions
- open blockers
- current workflow route
- restart block
Control rules:
- Do not include passwords, payment data, or restricted client material.
- Mark unresolved decisions as pending rather than silently treating them as approved.
- Do not start the next workflow.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
43
MP11 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Project Restart Pack
Restore a saved project safely, verify what is still current, and identify the next incomplete control gate.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Load the saved context file and previous approved outputs.
- Compare saved state with current files, URLs, rules, and project goals.
- Mark current, stale, conflicting, missing, and review-needed records.
- Restore approved decisions without repeating completed work.
- Identify the next incomplete control gate.
- Create the restart handoff.
Return fields
- restored project identity
- current records
- stale records
- conflicts
- missing inputs
- approved decisions restored
- next incomplete gate
- restart blocker
- next setup route
Guardrails
- Do not assume a saved record is still current.
- Do not overwrite a newer approved decision with an older local file.
- Do not skip setup QA after a major project change.
Short command
Run Project Restart Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Project Restart Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Restore a saved project safely, verify what is still current, and identify the next incomplete control gate.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Load the saved context file and previous approved outputs.
2. Compare saved state with current files, URLs, rules, and project goals.
3. Mark current, stale, conflicting, missing, and review-needed records.
4. Restore approved decisions without repeating completed work.
5. Identify the next incomplete control gate.
6. Create the restart handoff.
Return the result with these fields:
- restored project identity
- current records
- stale records
- conflicts
- missing inputs
- approved decisions restored
- next incomplete gate
- restart blocker
- next setup route
Control rules:
- Do not assume a saved record is still current.
- Do not overwrite a newer approved decision with an older local file.
- Do not skip setup QA after a major project change.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
44
MP12 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Final Setup Validation Pack
Run the final project-control gate and stop downstream work when any blocking setup field remains incomplete.
Master pack
Control tasks
- Check the thirteen setup-gate fields.
- Separate complete, incomplete, conflicting, and review-needed fields.
- Confirm page-queue, link, proof, tone, compliance, and route controls.
- Confirm approval ownership and open blockers.
- Issue pass, revise, hold, or fail.
- Prepare the next-workflow handoff only after a pass.
Return fields
- setup field
- status
- evidence
- conflict
- blocking gap
- review-needed item
- setup decision
- approval owner
- next workflow route
- handoff readiness
Guardrails
- Do not pass when a core source-context field is missing.
- Do not treat optional polish as a substitute for missing project purpose or boundaries.
- Do not start the next workflow.
Short command
Run Final Setup Validation Pack for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Final Setup Validation Pack for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Run the final project-control gate and stop downstream work when any blocking setup field remains incomplete.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Check the thirteen setup-gate fields.
2. Separate complete, incomplete, conflicting, and review-needed fields.
3. Confirm page-queue, link, proof, tone, compliance, and route controls.
4. Confirm approval ownership and open blockers.
5. Issue pass, revise, hold, or fail.
6. Prepare the next-workflow handoff only after a pass.
Return the result with these fields:
- setup field
- status
- evidence
- conflict
- blocking gap
- review-needed item
- setup decision
- approval owner
- next workflow route
- handoff readiness
Control rules:
- Do not pass when a core source-context field is missing.
- Do not treat optional polish as a substitute for missing project purpose or boundaries.
- Do not start the next workflow.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
45
C33 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Local Context File Builder
Create the portable local project-state file without starting a new analysis pass.
Single control
Control tasks
- Assemble approved context, boundaries, queue state, protected pages, proof, links, tone, compliance, route, and blockers.
- Add version and approval status.
- Create a compact restart block.
Return fields
- local context file
- version
- approval state
- open blockers
- current route
- restart block
Guardrails
- Exclude sensitive credentials and restricted data.
- Do not mark pending fields approved.
Short command
Run Local Context File Builder for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Local Context File Builder for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Create the portable local project-state file without starting a new analysis pass.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Assemble approved context, boundaries, queue state, protected pages, proof, links, tone, compliance, route, and blockers.
2. Add version and approval status.
3. Create a compact restart block.
Return the result with these fields:
- local context file
- version
- approval state
- open blockers
- current route
- restart block
Control rules:
- Exclude sensitive credentials and restricted data.
- Do not mark pending fields approved.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
46
C34 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Master Context Update
Apply approved changes to the master context while preserving version history and unresolved conflicts.
Single control
Control tasks
- Compare proposed changes with the current master context.
- Classify add, replace, deprecate, conflict, or pending.
- Record reason, approver, and affected workflows.
- Issue a new version.
Return fields
- field
- old value
- proposed value
- change type
- reason
- approver
- affected workflow
- conflict
- new version
Guardrails
- Only approved changes can replace the master value.
- Keep the previous version and conflict record.
Short command
Run Master Context Update for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Master Context Update for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Apply approved changes to the master context while preserving version history and unresolved conflicts.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Compare proposed changes with the current master context.
2. Classify add, replace, deprecate, conflict, or pending.
3. Record reason, approver, and affected workflows.
4. Issue a new version.
Return the result with these fields:
- field
- old value
- proposed value
- change type
- reason
- approver
- affected workflow
- conflict
- new version
Control rules:
- Only approved changes can replace the master value.
- Keep the previous version and conflict record.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
47
C35 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Session Restart Setup
Prepare the exact context, completed gates, open blockers, and next module for a new MIRENA session.
Single control
Control tasks
- Load the latest approved context version.
- List completed controls and outputs.
- List open blockers and pending approvals.
- Name the next module and required input.
- Create the restart prompt.
Return fields
- context version
- completed controls
- approved outputs
- open blockers
- pending approvals
- next module
- required input
- restart prompt
Guardrails
- Do not repeat completed work unless a relevant input changed.
- Do not skip the next incomplete gate.
Short command
Run Session Restart Setup for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Session Restart Setup for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Prepare the exact context, completed gates, open blockers, and next module for a new MIRENA session.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Load the latest approved context version.
2. List completed controls and outputs.
3. List open blockers and pending approvals.
4. Name the next module and required input.
5. Create the restart prompt.
Return the result with these fields:
- context version
- completed controls
- approved outputs
- open blockers
- pending approvals
- next module
- required input
- restart prompt
Control rules:
- Do not repeat completed work unless a relevant input changed.
- Do not skip the next incomplete gate.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
48
C36 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Next Workflow Route
Choose the next MIRENA workflow for one approved item and state the required input and owner.
Single control
Control tasks
- Identify the approved item and current state.
- Choose one route.
- Record the route reason, required input, owner, blocker, and stop condition.
- Prepare the handoff note.
Return fields
- item
- current state
- selected route
- reason
- required input
- owner
- blocker
- stop condition
- handoff note
Guardrails
- Do not run the selected workflow.
- Schema cues remain blocked until approved visible copy exists.
Short command
Run Next Workflow Route for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Next Workflow Route for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Choose the next MIRENA workflow for one approved item and state the required input and owner.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify the approved item and current state.
2. Choose one route.
3. Record the route reason, required input, owner, blocker, and stop condition.
4. Prepare the handoff note.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- current state
- selected route
- reason
- required input
- owner
- blocker
- stop condition
- handoff note
Control rules:
- Do not run the selected workflow.
- Schema cues remain blocked until approved visible copy exists.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
49
C37 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Handoff Contract
Create the formal contract between the approved setup and one downstream workflow.
Single control
Control tasks
- Name the item, source-context version, approval state, route, owner, required input, expected output, exclusions, proof, links, and return condition.
- Record the acceptance gate.
Return fields
- item
- source-context version
- approval state
- route
- owner
- required input
- expected output
- exclusions
- proof requirements
- link requirements
- acceptance gate
Guardrails
- Do not hand off an unapproved item.
- Do not let the downstream workflow change source context silently.
Short command
Run Handoff Contract for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Handoff Contract for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Create the formal contract between the approved setup and one downstream workflow.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the item, source-context version, approval state, route, owner, required input, expected output, exclusions, proof, links, and return condition.
2. Record the acceptance gate.
Return the result with these fields:
- item
- source-context version
- approval state
- route
- owner
- required input
- expected output
- exclusions
- proof requirements
- link requirements
- acceptance gate
Control rules:
- Do not hand off an unapproved item.
- Do not let the downstream workflow change source context silently.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
50
C38 · State, handoff, and setup QA
Setup QA
Check the complete setup record for missing fields, contradictions, unapproved decisions, and route gaps.
Single control
Control tasks
- Check all thirteen setup-gate fields.
- Check module completion, evidence, conflicts, and approval state.
- Return pass, revise, hold, or fail.
- List the exact repair modules.
Return fields
- setup field
- status
- evidence
- conflict
- approval state
- blocking gap
- repair module
- setup decision
- next route
Guardrails
- Do not pass when a core field is missing.
- Do not start downstream work inside QA.
Short command
Run Setup QA for [TARGET].
Expanded prompt
Run Setup QA for this project.
Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]
Control purpose:
Check the complete setup record for missing fields, contradictions, unapproved decisions, and route gaps.
Complete these tasks in order:
1. Check all thirteen setup-gate fields.
2. Check module completion, evidence, conflicts, and approval state.
3. Return pass, revise, hold, or fail.
4. List the exact repair modules.
Return the result with these fields:
- setup field
- status
- evidence
- conflict
- approval state
- blocking gap
- repair module
- setup decision
- next route
Control rules:
- Do not pass when a core field is missing.
- Do not start downstream work inside QA.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
Project control has one job: prepare and govern the handoff.
Keeping each page role distinct prevents a setup prompt from turning into a topical map, brief, draft, or schema task.
Source Context Template
Creates the reusable site, audience, offer, entity, boundary, inventory, proof, voice, and output record.
Build source context →Project Control Library
Approves lanes, page queues, protected owners, proof, links, language, project state, setup QA, and handoff.
Build a control prompt →Workflow Routing Library
Selects the next module across the wider MIRENA system after project control has recorded the route and approval state.
Open workflow routing →Downstream workflow
Runs mapping, briefing, rewriting, link mapping, information gain, SERP planning, or final QA under the handoff contract.
Compare output contracts →A route names the next workflow. It does not run it.
The selected route needs an approved item, required input, owner, blocker state, and handoff note.
| Route | Minimum handoff condition | Destination |
|---|---|---|
| Topical Maps and Planning | Approved page and cluster decisions | Open route → |
| Raw Semantic Discovery | Upstream evidence collection without page approval | Open route → |
| Content Briefs | Approved page purpose, entities, proof, links, and format | Open route → |
| Drafting and Rewriting | Approved brief or approved repair plan | Open route → |
| Entity SEO and Salience | Approved entity problem or page-level entity task | Open route → |
| Internal Linking | Approved page ownership and route rules | Open route → |
| Information Gain | Approved page owner and proof-ready differentiation task | Open route → |
| SERP Feature Planning | Approved page and search-format target | Open route → |
| Schema Cues | Human-approved visible copy only | Open route → |
| Final QA | Complete page package and evidence | Open route → |
| Hold | Missing input, proof, owner, approval, or route | Open route → |
| Reject | Hard boundary or failed project fit | Open route → |
Source context and project-control prompt FAQ
What is the MIRENA project-control prompt library?
It is the setup and governance layer that defines the site, audience, offer, entities, topic boundaries, page-queue rules, protected pages, proof, internal links, language rules, and next route before production begins.
Why does this rebuild contain 50 modules when the old title said 30?
The visible inventory contains twelve master prompt packs and thirty-eight single controls. The rebuilt title, filters, exports, and module numbering use the complete fifty-module count.
When should I use a master pack?
Use a master pack when several related setup tasks share the same context and belong inside one control layer. Keep approval gates, page decisions, briefing, drafting, schema cues, and final QA in their own sequence.
When should I use a single control?
Use a single control when one decision needs precision, evidence, a named owner, or a clear audit record. Examples include Buyer Fit Check, Page versus Section Guard, Claims Guard, or Next Workflow Route.
How is this page different from the Source Context Template?
The template builds the reusable project profile. This page selects and runs the controls that approve topic lanes, page queues, protected pages, proof, links, language, project state, and handoff.
How is this page different from the Workflow Routing prompt page?
This page chooses controls inside the source-context and project-governance layer. The broader routing library chooses a module across the full MIRENA system after this setup layer has passed.
Why must approval gates stay sequential?
A later output depends on an earlier decision. A page must be approved before it is briefed, a brief before it is drafted, and visible copy before final schema work. Combining those gates removes the evidence trail.
Can I import the JSON from the Source Context Template?
Yes. The console reads the local JSON inside the browser tab and adds a compact context summary to the selected prompt. Review the approval status before using an approval or handoff module.
Does the console submit or retain project information?
No. The standalone console has no form endpoint, network request, or browser-storage call. Copy and downloads are created locally in the browser.
When can schema cues run?
Schema cues can be routed only after setup QA, the relevant writing workflow, final QA, and human approval of the visible copy. This project-control page records the route but does not create final structured data.
Control the project before MIRENA creates the output.
Build the source context, choose the smallest matching control, pass all thirteen setup checks, and hand one approved item into one named workflow.