50 MIRENA Source Context and Project Control Prompts
MIRENA docs · Project-control layer

50 MIRENA source context and project control prompts for clean setup, clear gates, and safe handoff.

Source-context and project-control prompts define what the project is, what belongs, what is blocked, which pages are protected, which claims need proof, and which workflow can run next.

The complete inventory contains 12 master prompt packs and 38 single controls. Build the reusable project profile in the Source Context Template, then use this console to choose the smallest control module that fits the current job.

  • 12 master prompt packs
  • 38 single controls
  • Five control phases
  • Thirteen-point setup gate

MIRENA Project Control Console

Choose the current setup state, control job, asset, and desired route. The console selects one module, shows its prerequisites, builds the prompt, and records any stop condition.

50 controlled modules

1. Source-context state

Approval state changes which modules can safely run.

2. Control job and asset

Choose one main job. Use the exact-module field only when the required control is already known.

3. Prompt depth

Use the short command when the project state is already loaded. Use the expanded prompt when the controls need to travel with the instruction.

This standalone console has no form endpoint, network request, or browser-storage call. Do not enter passwords, full payment-card data, or restricted client material.

Page repair

The control layer should make the next safe decision easy to find.

The rebuild turns a long reading stream into a working console, a corrected fifty-module inventory, a searchable library, and a visible setup gate.

Current frictionRebuilt controlUser result
Thirty in the title, fifty visible modulesOne numbered 12-plus-38 inventoryStable IDs, correct counts, and consistent exports
Quick-start routes after the full catalogueProject Control Console in the first task viewThe user starts from current state instead of scanning every prompt
No visible search or phase filtersFull-text search plus phase and module-type filtersOne control can be found without reading the whole page
Setup controls and downstream work can blurExplicit route-only handoff and schema timingThe page governs the work without starting the next workflow
Setup readiness is described but not scoredThirteen-point gate with repair modulesPass, revise, hold, or fail has a visible reason and route
Five control phases

Setup moves from project identity to an approved handoff.

Master packs combine related setup checks. Single controls isolate one decision. Neither format may skip approval gates.

01

Foundation and topic boundaries

Build the source-context base and set the site boundary.

14 modules View this phase →
02

Page queue and fit decisions

Score candidate work and record page, content-block, merge, hold, or reject decisions.

13 modules View this phase →
03

Site protection and link rules

Protect page owners and define internal route controls.

7 modules View this phase →
04

Proof, tone, and compliance

Control evidence, claims, voice, and compliance before writing.

6 modules View this phase →
05

State, handoff, and setup QA

Preserve project state, route the next job, create the handoff, and pass setup QA.

10 modules View this phase →
Final control gate

Thirteen setup checks decide if the project can enter handoff.

Core context fields control whether the project can continue at all. The remaining fields control page queues, links, proof, language, compliance, and the next route.

Project-control checklist

Mark only fields that have evidence and human-reviewed values.

0 of 13 setup checks complete
Complete prompt inventory

Search all 50 project-control modules.

Each card contains the purpose, prerequisites, tasks, return fields, guardrails, short command, and expanded prompt.

50 modules shown
01 MP01 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Source Context Setup Pack

Create the project control base before page discovery, mapping, briefing, rewriting, linking, or production begins.
Master pack
PrerequisitesNone
Next control routeMP02, MP03, MP10, MP12
Source-context statenone
Best fornew projects, new sites, new product lines, unclear site focus, first MIRENA session

Control tasks

  • Build the Source Context Profile.
  • Define the site purpose, audience, offer, and target region.
  • Rank the primary and secondary entity sets.
  • Define allowed topic lanes, blocked topic lanes, and hard exclusions.
  • Record internal link targets and approved proof sources.
  • Choose the next setup route without creating page ideas.

Return fields

  • source context profile
  • site purpose
  • audience
  • offer
  • target region
  • primary entities
  • secondary entities
  • allowed topic lanes
  • blocked topic lanes
  • proof sources
  • internal link targets
  • blockers
  • review-needed items
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Stop when the site purpose, audience, offer, or allowed topic lanes are unclear.
  • Do not create a page queue.
  • Do not create a topical map, brief, draft, rewrite, link map, information gain plan, SERP plan, or schema note.

Short command

Run Source Context Setup Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Source Context Setup Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Create the project control base before page discovery, mapping, briefing, rewriting, linking, or production begins.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Build the Source Context Profile.
2. Define the site purpose, audience, offer, and target region.
3. Rank the primary and secondary entity sets.
4. Define allowed topic lanes, blocked topic lanes, and hard exclusions.
5. Record internal link targets and approved proof sources.
6. Choose the next setup route without creating page ideas.

Return the result with these fields:
- source context profile
- site purpose
- audience
- offer
- target region
- primary entities
- secondary entities
- allowed topic lanes
- blocked topic lanes
- proof sources
- internal link targets
- blockers
- review-needed items
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Stop when the site purpose, audience, offer, or allowed topic lanes are unclear.
- Do not create a page queue.
- Do not create a topical map, brief, draft, rewrite, link map, information gain plan, SERP plan, or schema note.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
02 MP02 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Project Intake Pack

Classify supplied files, URLs, exports, notes, and previous MIRENA work before any weak input can drive the project.
Master pack
PrerequisitesNone
Next control routeMP01, MP03, MP04, MP10
Source-context statenone
Best forexisting projects, large file sets, site audits, restarts, multi-session work

Control tasks

  • Identify every supplied input.
  • Classify each input by type, source quality, and likely use.
  • Separate setup inputs from downstream production inputs.
  • Flag missing files, conflicting records, stale material, and risky inputs.
  • Mark each input keep, hold, ignore, or review.
  • Recommend the safe processing order and next setup pack.

Return fields

  • input name or label
  • input type
  • source quality
  • setup value
  • downstream value
  • risk
  • missing field
  • keep, hold, ignore, or review
  • recommended processing order
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not extract raw page ideas.
  • Do not let an unverified or stale file override approved source context.
  • Route each input before any downstream analysis begins.

Short command

Run Project Intake Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Project Intake Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Classify supplied files, URLs, exports, notes, and previous MIRENA work before any weak input can drive the project.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify every supplied input.
2. Classify each input by type, source quality, and likely use.
3. Separate setup inputs from downstream production inputs.
4. Flag missing files, conflicting records, stale material, and risky inputs.
5. Mark each input keep, hold, ignore, or review.
6. Recommend the safe processing order and next setup pack.

Return the result with these fields:
- input name or label
- input type
- source quality
- setup value
- downstream value
- risk
- missing field
- keep, hold, ignore, or review
- recommended processing order
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not extract raw page ideas.
- Do not let an unverified or stale file override approved source context.
- Route each input before any downstream analysis begins.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
03 MP03 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Topic Lane Control Pack

Set the project’s topical boundary before any proposed page can enter a map or publishing queue.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01
Next control routeMP04, MP05, C17, MP12
Source-context statedraft
Best forbroad topics, multi-service sites, AI-produced queues, map cleanup, scope repair

Control tasks

  • Define allowed topic lanes.
  • Define blocked topic lanes.
  • Define hard exclusions.
  • Define adjacent-topic rules.
  • Define page-versus-content-block rules.
  • Define topic-drift warnings.
  • Define the review route for uncertain topics.

Return fields

  • allowed topic lane
  • reason it belongs
  • blocked topic lane
  • reason it is blocked
  • hard exclusion
  • adjacent-topic rule
  • page-versus-content-block rule
  • drift warning
  • review-needed topic
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not approve pages.
  • Do not build the topical map.
  • Treat uncertain adjacency as review-needed rather than silently expanding the site.

Short command

Run Topic Lane Control Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Topic Lane Control Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Set the project’s topical boundary before any proposed page can enter a map or publishing queue.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Define allowed topic lanes.
2. Define blocked topic lanes.
3. Define hard exclusions.
4. Define adjacent-topic rules.
5. Define page-versus-content-block rules.
6. Define topic-drift warnings.
7. Define the review route for uncertain topics.

Return the result with these fields:
- allowed topic lane
- reason it belongs
- blocked topic lane
- reason it is blocked
- hard exclusion
- adjacent-topic rule
- page-versus-content-block rule
- drift warning
- review-needed topic
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not approve pages.
- Do not build the topical map.
- Treat uncertain adjacency as review-needed rather than silently expanding the site.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
04 C01 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Source Context Profile

Create or repair the compact project profile that every later control check must use.
Single control
PrerequisitesNone
Next control routeC02, C03, C04, C06, C08
Source-context statenone
Best fornew projects, profile repair, handoff setup

Control tasks

  • Name the site, offer, audience, region, entities, topic boundaries, page inventory, proof, and desired output.
  • Mark missing and conflicting fields.
  • Record the approval state.

Return fields

  • profile field
  • current value
  • source
  • status
  • conflict
  • missing value
  • approval state
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not infer a business fact when the source is missing.
  • Do not create page ideas.

Short command

Run Source Context Profile for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Source Context Profile for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Create or repair the compact project profile that every later control check must use.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the site, offer, audience, region, entities, topic boundaries, page inventory, proof, and desired output.
2. Mark missing and conflicting fields.
3. Record the approval state.

Return the result with these fields:
- profile field
- current value
- source
- status
- conflict
- missing value
- approval state
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not infer a business fact when the source is missing.
- Do not create page ideas.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
05 C02 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Site Purpose Definition

Give the site one clear role, value, and operating boundary.
Single control
PrerequisitesC01
Next control routeC03, C04, C08
Source-context statedraft
Best fornew sites, repositioning, scope repair

Control tasks

  • State what the site does.
  • State what it does not do.
  • Name the user outcome and project role.
  • Flag competing or vague purposes.

Return fields

  • site purpose
  • primary user outcome
  • included role
  • excluded role
  • conflict
  • approval state
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not use a broad industry label as the purpose.
  • Do not combine unrelated offers into one purpose.

Short command

Run Site Purpose Definition for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Site Purpose Definition for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Give the site one clear role, value, and operating boundary.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. State what the site does.
2. State what it does not do.
3. Name the user outcome and project role.
4. Flag competing or vague purposes.

Return the result with these fields:
- site purpose
- primary user outcome
- included role
- excluded role
- conflict
- approval state
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not use a broad industry label as the purpose.
- Do not combine unrelated offers into one purpose.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
06 C03 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Audience Definition

Define the primary audience by role, state, need, skill, and decision context.
Single control
PrerequisitesC01
Next control routeC04, C18
Source-context statedraft
Best forbuyer fit, content planning, multi-audience sites

Control tasks

  • Name the primary audience.
  • Name optional secondary audiences.
  • Record skill, buyer state, problem, and exclusion.
  • Flag audience conflicts.

Return fields

  • primary audience
  • secondary audience
  • user state
  • skill level
  • need
  • excluded audience
  • conflict
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Reject labels such as everyone, businesses, or marketers without a narrower state.
  • Do not let a secondary audience displace the primary one.

Short command

Run Audience Definition for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Audience Definition for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Define the primary audience by role, state, need, skill, and decision context.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the primary audience.
2. Name optional secondary audiences.
3. Record skill, buyer state, problem, and exclusion.
4. Flag audience conflicts.

Return the result with these fields:
- primary audience
- secondary audience
- user state
- skill level
- need
- excluded audience
- conflict
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Reject labels such as everyone, businesses, or marketers without a narrower state.
- Do not let a secondary audience displace the primary one.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
07 C04 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Offer Definition

Define what the site sells, teaches, supports, or provides and the conditions attached to it.
Single control
PrerequisitesC01
Next control routeC05, C18, C19
Source-context statedraft
Best forproduct setup, service sites, commercial routes

Control tasks

  • Name the offer.
  • Describe the user job and benefit.
  • Record access, price model, conditions, and exclusions.
  • Flag unsupported or conflicting offer claims.

Return fields

  • offer name
  • offer type
  • user job
  • benefit
  • commercial model
  • condition
  • exclusion
  • claim risk
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not turn a desired positioning claim into a verified fact.
  • Keep platform, payment, and service boundaries explicit.

Short command

Run Offer Definition for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Offer Definition for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Define what the site sells, teaches, supports, or provides and the conditions attached to it.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the offer.
2. Describe the user job and benefit.
3. Record access, price model, conditions, and exclusions.
4. Flag unsupported or conflicting offer claims.

Return the result with these fields:
- offer name
- offer type
- user job
- benefit
- commercial model
- condition
- exclusion
- claim risk
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not turn a desired positioning claim into a verified fact.
- Keep platform, payment, and service boundaries explicit.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
08 C05 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Region Definition

Set geography, language, localization, spelling, availability, and regulatory context.
Single control
PrerequisitesC01, C04
Next control routeC08, C32
Source-context statedraft
Best forlocal sites, international sites, regulated markets

Control tasks

  • Name the target region and language.
  • Record local availability and spelling rules.
  • Record regulated or location-specific claims.
  • Flag missing localization sources.

Return fields

  • target region
  • language
  • spelling standard
  • availability rule
  • local proof need
  • regulatory note
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not imply service in an unconfirmed region.
  • Do not reuse local claims without current local evidence.

Short command

Run Region Definition for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Region Definition for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Set geography, language, localization, spelling, availability, and regulatory context.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the target region and language.
2. Record local availability and spelling rules.
3. Record regulated or location-specific claims.
4. Flag missing localization sources.

Return the result with these fields:
- target region
- language
- spelling standard
- availability rule
- local proof need
- regulatory note
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not imply service in an unconfirmed region.
- Do not reuse local claims without current local evidence.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
09 C06 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Primary Entity Set

Rank the entities that must lead the site and define the attributes that make each one relevant.
Single control
PrerequisitesC01, C02, C04
Next control routeC07, C08
Source-context statedraft
Best forentity setup, site focus, map preparation

Control tasks

  • Extract candidate entities.
  • Rank the primary set.
  • Attach defining attributes and approved relationships.
  • Remove broad or off-context entities.

Return fields

  • primary entity
  • entity type
  • weight
  • defining attribute
  • approved relationship
  • excluded association
  • source
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not promote a high-volume term when it weakens site identity.
  • Keep each entity tied to a stated audience, offer, or workflow.

Short command

Run Primary Entity Set for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Primary Entity Set for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Rank the entities that must lead the site and define the attributes that make each one relevant.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Extract candidate entities.
2. Rank the primary set.
3. Attach defining attributes and approved relationships.
4. Remove broad or off-context entities.

Return the result with these fields:
- primary entity
- entity type
- weight
- defining attribute
- approved relationship
- excluded association
- source
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not promote a high-volume term when it weakens site identity.
- Keep each entity tied to a stated audience, offer, or workflow.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
10 C07 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Secondary Entity Set

Select supporting entities that add depth without competing with the primary entity stack.
Single control
PrerequisitesC06
Next control routeC08, C11
Source-context statedraft
Best fortopic depth, comparison planning, entity maps

Control tasks

  • Extract related entities.
  • Classify support, comparison, proof, and route roles.
  • Attach each entity to a primary owner.
  • Block dilution and redundant entity groups.

Return fields

  • secondary entity
  • role
  • primary owner
  • relationship
  • page or content-block use
  • dilution risk
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not add an entity because competitors mention it when it lacks project fit.
  • Every secondary entity needs a primary owner.

Short command

Run Secondary Entity Set for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Secondary Entity Set for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Select supporting entities that add depth without competing with the primary entity stack.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Extract related entities.
2. Classify support, comparison, proof, and route roles.
3. Attach each entity to a primary owner.
4. Block dilution and redundant entity groups.

Return the result with these fields:
- secondary entity
- role
- primary owner
- relationship
- page or content-block use
- dilution risk
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not add an entity because competitors mention it when it lacks project fit.
- Every secondary entity needs a primary owner.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
11 C08 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Allowed Topic Lanes

Define the topic lanes that directly reinforce the approved site purpose, entities, audience, and workflows.
Single control
PrerequisitesC02, C03, C04, C06
Next control routeC09, C10, C11
Source-context statedraft
Best forscope control, topical maps, page queues

Control tasks

  • List allowed lanes.
  • State why each lane belongs.
  • Name the likely page or cluster owner.
  • Record review conditions for narrow exceptions.

Return fields

  • allowed lane
  • reason
  • primary entity
  • audience fit
  • owner
  • condition
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not treat broad industry relevance as sufficient fit.
  • Keep allowed lanes specific enough to guide a page decision.

Short command

Run Allowed Topic Lanes for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Allowed Topic Lanes for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Define the topic lanes that directly reinforce the approved site purpose, entities, audience, and workflows.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List allowed lanes.
2. State why each lane belongs.
3. Name the likely page or cluster owner.
4. Record review conditions for narrow exceptions.

Return the result with these fields:
- allowed lane
- reason
- primary entity
- audience fit
- owner
- condition
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not treat broad industry relevance as sufficient fit.
- Keep allowed lanes specific enough to guide a page decision.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
12 C09 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Blocked Topic Lanes

Record topics that look adjacent but should not enter the site or current project.
Single control
PrerequisitesC08
Next control routeC10, C11, C17
Source-context statedraft
Best forscope control, AI page queues, site expansion

Control tasks

  • List blocked lanes.
  • State the conflict with audience, offer, entity, workflow, or route.
  • Name any existing page that should absorb a narrow subtopic.
  • Set the review owner.

Return fields

  • blocked lane
  • reason
  • conflicting entity or audience
  • possible existing owner
  • review owner
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not soften a confirmed boundary into an optional note.
  • Do not block a topic without recording the reason.

Short command

Run Blocked Topic Lanes for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Blocked Topic Lanes for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Record topics that look adjacent but should not enter the site or current project.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List blocked lanes.
2. State the conflict with audience, offer, entity, workflow, or route.
3. Name any existing page that should absorb a narrow subtopic.
4. Set the review owner.

Return the result with these fields:
- blocked lane
- reason
- conflicting entity or audience
- possible existing owner
- review owner
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not soften a confirmed boundary into an optional note.
- Do not block a topic without recording the reason.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
13 C10 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Hard Exclusions

Set non-negotiable topic, claim, audience, privacy, legal, and workflow exclusions.
Single control
PrerequisitesC01, C09
Next control routeC11, C14, C32
Source-context statedraft
Best forregulated work, brand safety, privacy, risk control

Control tasks

  • List each hard exclusion.
  • Classify its type.
  • State the trigger and required action.
  • Set the escalation or rejection rule.

Return fields

  • hard exclusion
  • type
  • trigger
  • reason
  • required action
  • escalation owner
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Hard exclusions override scores and commercial value.
  • Do not proceed when the exclusion status is uncertain.

Short command

Run Hard Exclusions for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Hard Exclusions for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Set non-negotiable topic, claim, audience, privacy, legal, and workflow exclusions.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List each hard exclusion.
2. Classify its type.
3. State the trigger and required action.
4. Set the escalation or rejection rule.

Return the result with these fields:
- hard exclusion
- type
- trigger
- reason
- required action
- escalation owner
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Hard exclusions override scores and commercial value.
- Do not proceed when the exclusion status is uncertain.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
14 C11 · Foundation and topic boundaries

Adjacent Topic Rules

Decide when a related topic becomes a page, a content block, an internal link, a hold, or an exclusion.
Single control
PrerequisitesC08, C09, C10
Next control routeC16, C17
Source-context stateapproved
Best forscope edges, page-versus-content-block decisions, map cleanup

Control tasks

  • Identify the adjacent topic.
  • Check entity, buyer, workflow, and link fit.
  • Choose page, content block, link, hold, or block.
  • Record the boundary condition.

Return fields

  • adjacent topic
  • fit finding
  • decision
  • existing owner
  • boundary condition
  • reason
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not approve adjacency from lexical similarity alone.
  • A separate page needs a distinct user job and route.

Short command

Run Adjacent Topic Rules for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Adjacent Topic Rules for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Decide when a related topic becomes a page, a content block, an internal link, a hold, or an exclusion.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify the adjacent topic.
2. Check entity, buyer, workflow, and link fit.
3. Choose page, content block, link, hold, or block.
4. Record the boundary condition.

Return the result with these fields:
- adjacent topic
- fit finding
- decision
- existing owner
- boundary condition
- reason
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not approve adjacency from lexical similarity alone.
- A separate page needs a distinct user job and route.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
15 MP04 · Page queue and fit decisions

Page Queue Approval Pack

Review a proposed page queue and decide which ideas become pages, content blocks, merges, holds, or rejections.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01, MP03
Next control routeMP05, C14, C16, MP09, MP12
Source-context stateapproved
Best fornew page lists, map cleanup, editorial planning, client approvals, site growth queues

Control tasks

  • Import the page queue without adding new items.
  • Score each proposed page for source-context fit.
  • Score buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
  • Compare each proposal with existing page owners.
  • Decide page, content block, merge, hold, or reject.
  • Add rejection or revision notes.
  • Route approved items without creating briefs or drafts.

Return fields

  • proposed page
  • target entity or topic
  • source-context fit
  • buyer fit
  • workflow fit
  • link fit
  • differentiation fit
  • page, content block, merge, hold, or reject
  • reason
  • required internal links
  • next workflow route

Guardrails

  • Do not expand the supplied page list unless the user asks for discovery.
  • Do not create a brief or draft.
  • A page decision must have one canonical owner and one reason.

Short command

Run Page Queue Approval Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Page Queue Approval Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Review a proposed page queue and decide which ideas become pages, content blocks, merges, holds, or rejections.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Import the page queue without adding new items.
2. Score each proposed page for source-context fit.
3. Score buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
4. Compare each proposal with existing page owners.
5. Decide page, content block, merge, hold, or reject.
6. Add rejection or revision notes.
7. Route approved items without creating briefs or drafts.

Return the result with these fields:
- proposed page
- target entity or topic
- source-context fit
- buyer fit
- workflow fit
- link fit
- differentiation fit
- page, content block, merge, hold, or reject
- reason
- required internal links
- next workflow route

Control rules:
- Do not expand the supplied page list unless the user asks for discovery.
- Do not create a brief or draft.
- A page decision must have one canonical owner and one reason.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
16 MP05 · Page queue and fit decisions

Guardrail Scoring Pack

Apply a repeatable scoring model to topics, pages, findings, or workflow requests before approval.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01, MP03
Next control routeMP04, C14, C22, MP12
Source-context stateapproved
Best forpage queues, cluster ideas, audit findings, refresh lists, project reviews

Control tasks

  • Score source-context, topic, and entity fit.
  • Score buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
  • Record proof support and drift risk.
  • Record the evidence for every high or low score.
  • Decide approve, revise, hold, or reject.
  • Choose the next setup or downstream route.

Return fields

  • item
  • item type
  • source-context score
  • topic-fit score
  • entity-fit score
  • buyer-fit score
  • workflow-fit score
  • link-fit score
  • differentiation score
  • proof support
  • drift risk
  • approve, revise, hold, or reject
  • reason
  • next workflow route

Guardrails

  • Do not approve an item with unclear source-context fit.
  • Do not treat a score as proof of search performance.
  • Hard exclusions and wrong-audience conflicts override a high total.

Short command

Run Guardrail Scoring Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Guardrail Scoring Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Apply a repeatable scoring model to topics, pages, findings, or workflow requests before approval.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Score source-context, topic, and entity fit.
2. Score buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
3. Record proof support and drift risk.
4. Record the evidence for every high or low score.
5. Decide approve, revise, hold, or reject.
6. Choose the next setup or downstream route.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- item type
- source-context score
- topic-fit score
- entity-fit score
- buyer-fit score
- workflow-fit score
- link-fit score
- differentiation score
- proof support
- drift risk
- approve, revise, hold, or reject
- reason
- next workflow route

Control rules:
- Do not approve an item with unclear source-context fit.
- Do not treat a score as proof of search performance.
- Hard exclusions and wrong-audience conflicts override a high total.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
17 C12 · Page queue and fit decisions

Page Queue Import

Load a proposed page list without altering, expanding, or prematurely approving it.
Single control
PrerequisitesMP01, MP03
Next control routeC13
Source-context stateapproved
Best forCSV lists, keyword exports, editorial queues, client lists

Control tasks

  • Parse each supplied item.
  • Preserve source labels and order.
  • Normalize title, URL, topic, intent, and proposed role.
  • Flag duplicates and malformed rows.

Return fields

  • queue item ID
  • original label
  • normalized title
  • URL
  • topic
  • intent
  • proposed role
  • duplicate flag
  • input issue
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not add page ideas.
  • Keep the original source and row identity.

Short command

Run Page Queue Import for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Page Queue Import for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Load a proposed page list without altering, expanding, or prematurely approving it.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Parse each supplied item.
2. Preserve source labels and order.
3. Normalize title, URL, topic, intent, and proposed role.
4. Flag duplicates and malformed rows.

Return the result with these fields:
- queue item ID
- original label
- normalized title
- URL
- topic
- intent
- proposed role
- duplicate flag
- input issue
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not add page ideas.
- Keep the original source and row identity.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
18 C13 · Page queue and fit decisions

Page Queue Scoring

Score every imported queue item against the approved project controls.
Single control
PrerequisitesC12
Next control routeC14, C16
Source-context stateapproved
Best forlarge queues, project review, content planning

Control tasks

  • Score source-context, buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
  • Record evidence for each score.
  • Flag hard exclusions, duplicates, proof gaps, and route gaps.
  • Recommend a provisional decision.

Return fields

  • queue item ID
  • five fit scores
  • evidence
  • hard-stop flag
  • duplicate flag
  • proof gap
  • route gap
  • provisional decision

Guardrails

  • Do not let the score override a hard exclusion.
  • Do not approve a page without an owner and route.

Short command

Run Page Queue Scoring for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Page Queue Scoring for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Score every imported queue item against the approved project controls.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Score source-context, buyer, workflow, link, and differentiation fit.
2. Record evidence for each score.
3. Flag hard exclusions, duplicates, proof gaps, and route gaps.
4. Recommend a provisional decision.

Return the result with these fields:
- queue item ID
- five fit scores
- evidence
- hard-stop flag
- duplicate flag
- proof gap
- route gap
- provisional decision

Control rules:
- Do not let the score override a hard exclusion.
- Do not approve a page without an owner and route.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
19 C14 · Page queue and fit decisions

Page Approval Gate

Issue the human-controlled page, content-block, merge, hold, or reject decision.
Single control
PrerequisitesC13
Next control routeC15, C36, C37
Source-context stateapproved
Best formap approval, editorial governance, client sign-off

Control tasks

  • Review score evidence and stop conditions.
  • Compare existing owners.
  • Choose one decision.
  • Record approver, reason, dependencies, and route.

Return fields

  • item
  • decision
  • canonical owner
  • reason
  • approver
  • dependency
  • required change
  • next workflow route

Guardrails

  • Approval remains human-controlled.
  • Do not create a brief or draft inside the gate.

Short command

Run Page Approval Gate for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Page Approval Gate for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Issue the human-controlled page, content-block, merge, hold, or reject decision.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Review score evidence and stop conditions.
2. Compare existing owners.
3. Choose one decision.
4. Record approver, reason, dependencies, and route.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- decision
- canonical owner
- reason
- approver
- dependency
- required change
- next workflow route

Control rules:
- Approval remains human-controlled.
- Do not create a brief or draft inside the gate.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
20 C15 · Page queue and fit decisions

Page Rejection Notes

Create a reusable record explaining why a proposed page was rejected, merged, or held.
Single control
PrerequisitesC14
Next control routeC24, C25, C26
Source-context stateapproved
Best foraudit trails, client approvals, queue cleanup

Control tasks

  • Name the rejected or held item.
  • Record the failing control and evidence.
  • Name the existing owner or blocked lane.
  • State what would need to change for review.

Return fields

  • item
  • decision
  • failed control
  • evidence
  • existing owner
  • blocked lane
  • revision condition
  • review date or owner

Guardrails

  • Do not hide the rejection reason.
  • Do not recycle the same idea under a new title without resolving the cause.

Short command

Run Page Rejection Notes for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Page Rejection Notes for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Create a reusable record explaining why a proposed page was rejected, merged, or held.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the rejected or held item.
2. Record the failing control and evidence.
3. Name the existing owner or blocked lane.
4. State what would need to change for review.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- decision
- failed control
- evidence
- existing owner
- blocked lane
- revision condition
- review date or owner

Control rules:
- Do not hide the rejection reason.
- Do not recycle the same idea under a new title without resolving the cause.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
21 C16 · Page queue and fit decisions

Page vs Section Guard

Decide if a user need warrants its own URL or belongs inside an existing page.
Single control
PrerequisitesC11, C13
Next control routeC14, C25
Source-context stateapproved
Best forgranularity decisions, cannibalization prevention, briefing

Control tasks

  • Compare intent, user task, owner, proof, format, and next route.
  • Check search-result and current-site overlap.
  • Choose page, content block, FAQ, table, merge, or hold.
  • Record the canonical owner.

Return fields

  • topic or query
  • distinct user task
  • existing owner
  • overlap finding
  • recommended form
  • canonical owner
  • reason
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Minor wording differences do not justify separate URLs.
  • A new page needs a distinct job, owner, and route.

Short command

Run Page vs Section Guard for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Page vs Section Guard for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Decide if a user need warrants its own URL or belongs inside an existing page.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Compare intent, user task, owner, proof, format, and next route.
2. Check search-result and current-site overlap.
3. Choose page, content block, FAQ, table, merge, or hold.
4. Record the canonical owner.

Return the result with these fields:
- topic or query
- distinct user task
- existing owner
- overlap finding
- recommended form
- canonical owner
- reason
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Minor wording differences do not justify separate URLs.
- A new page needs a distinct job, owner, and route.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
22 C17 · Page queue and fit decisions

Topic Drift Check

Detect when a proposed item moves outside the approved entity, audience, offer, or workflow boundary.
Single control
PrerequisitesC08, C09, C10
Next control routeC14, C26
Source-context stateapproved
Best forpage queues, AI content plans, site expansion

Control tasks

  • Compare the item with allowed, blocked, and adjacent lanes.
  • Check entity and buyer displacement.
  • Measure route and owner clarity.
  • Return pass, revise, hold, or block.

Return fields

  • item
  • approved lane
  • drift signal
  • displaced entity or audience
  • route issue
  • decision
  • reason
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not treat query volume as permission to drift.
  • Hard exclusions return block.

Short command

Run Topic Drift Check for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Topic Drift Check for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Detect when a proposed item moves outside the approved entity, audience, offer, or workflow boundary.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Compare the item with allowed, blocked, and adjacent lanes.
2. Check entity and buyer displacement.
3. Measure route and owner clarity.
4. Return pass, revise, hold, or block.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- approved lane
- drift signal
- displaced entity or audience
- route issue
- decision
- reason
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not treat query volume as permission to drift.
- Hard exclusions return block.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
23 C18 · Page queue and fit decisions

Buyer Fit Check

Test if the proposed page serves a real need for the approved audience before, during, or after the offer.
Single control
PrerequisitesC03, C04
Next control routeC14
Source-context stateapproved
Best forcommercial support, use cases, comparison pages, support content

Control tasks

  • Name the target audience and user state.
  • State the page’s buyer or support job.
  • Check the conversion or support route.
  • Flag broad, low-quality, or wrong-audience demand.

Return fields

  • item
  • target audience
  • user state
  • buyer job
  • fit score
  • route
  • wrong-audience flag
  • reason

Guardrails

  • Traffic potential alone does not prove buyer fit.
  • Do not use a broad audience label.

Short command

Run Buyer Fit Check for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Buyer Fit Check for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Test if the proposed page serves a real need for the approved audience before, during, or after the offer.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the target audience and user state.
2. State the page’s buyer or support job.
3. Check the conversion or support route.
4. Flag broad, low-quality, or wrong-audience demand.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- target audience
- user state
- buyer job
- fit score
- route
- wrong-audience flag
- reason

Control rules:
- Traffic potential alone does not prove buyer fit.
- Do not use a broad audience label.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
24 C19 · Page queue and fit decisions

Workflow Fit Check

Test whether a page or task connects to an approved MIRENA output, offer, support path, or workflow stage.
Single control
PrerequisitesC04
Next control routeC14, C36
Source-context stateapproved
Best forroute decisions, page queues, project scope

Control tasks

  • Name the workflow or offer connection.
  • State the input and expected downstream output.
  • Check handoff feasibility.
  • Return fit, revise, hold, or reject.

Return fields

  • item
  • workflow connection
  • input
  • expected output
  • handoff feasibility
  • fit score
  • decision
  • reason

Guardrails

  • Do not invent a workflow connection.
  • Do not execute the downstream task.

Short command

Run Workflow Fit Check for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Workflow Fit Check for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Test whether a page or task connects to an approved MIRENA output, offer, support path, or workflow stage.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the workflow or offer connection.
2. State the input and expected downstream output.
3. Check handoff feasibility.
4. Return fit, revise, hold, or reject.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- workflow connection
- input
- expected output
- handoff feasibility
- fit score
- decision
- reason

Control rules:
- Do not invent a workflow connection.
- Do not execute the downstream task.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
25 C20 · Page queue and fit decisions

Link Fit Check

Test whether a page strengthens a meaningful parent, sibling, proof, support, or next-step route.
Single control
PrerequisitesC27
Next control routeC14, MP06
Source-context stateapproved
Best forsite architecture, page queues, support routes

Control tasks

  • Name the parent or hub.
  • Name likely inbound sources.
  • Name useful outbound destinations.
  • Check orphan, circular, and forced-link risk.

Return fields

  • item
  • parent or hub
  • inbound sources
  • outbound targets
  • link purpose
  • orphan risk
  • fit score
  • decision

Guardrails

  • Do not approve a page with no defensible route.
  • Do not use internal links only to move authority.

Short command

Run Link Fit Check for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Link Fit Check for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Test whether a page strengthens a meaningful parent, sibling, proof, support, or next-step route.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the parent or hub.
2. Name likely inbound sources.
3. Name useful outbound destinations.
4. Check orphan, circular, and forced-link risk.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- parent or hub
- inbound sources
- outbound targets
- link purpose
- orphan risk
- fit score
- decision

Control rules:
- Do not approve a page with no defensible route.
- Do not use internal links only to move authority.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
26 C21 · Page queue and fit decisions

Differentiation Fit Check

Test if the item can add useful proof, a decision model, first-hand detail, or a missing relationship.
Single control
PrerequisitesC29
Next control routeC14, C36
Source-context stateapproved
Best forinformation gain, comparison pages, content refresh

Control tasks

  • Identify repeated result-set or existing-site coverage.
  • Name the proposed information gain.
  • Check proof feasibility.
  • Choose approve, revise, merge, hold, or reject.

Return fields

  • item
  • repeated coverage
  • new relationship or evidence
  • proof feasibility
  • differentiation score
  • decision
  • reason
  • next workflow route

Guardrails

  • A new title is not information gain.
  • Do not approve a distinction that lacks proof or user value.

Short command

Run Differentiation Fit Check for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Differentiation Fit Check for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Test if the item can add useful proof, a decision model, first-hand detail, or a missing relationship.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify repeated result-set or existing-site coverage.
2. Name the proposed information gain.
3. Check proof feasibility.
4. Choose approve, revise, merge, hold, or reject.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- repeated coverage
- new relationship or evidence
- proof feasibility
- differentiation score
- decision
- reason
- next workflow route

Control rules:
- A new title is not information gain.
- Do not approve a distinction that lacks proof or user value.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
27 C22 · Page queue and fit decisions

Focus Score

Rate how strongly the project, cluster, or queue reinforces the approved site purpose and entity hierarchy.
Single control
PrerequisitesMP05
Next control routeC14, C24, C25, C26
Source-context stateapproved
Best forproject reviews, large maps, site expansion, queue cleanup

Control tasks

  • Score purpose alignment, entity concentration, lane discipline, buyer clarity, route clarity, and dilution risk.
  • List the items lowering focus.
  • Recommend keep, repair, merge, hold, or block actions.

Return fields

  • focus score
  • purpose alignment
  • entity concentration
  • lane discipline
  • buyer clarity
  • route clarity
  • dilution risk
  • repair action

Guardrails

  • Do not use one score to hide conflicting evidence.
  • Report the factors and items behind the total.

Short command

Run Focus Score for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Focus Score for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Rate how strongly the project, cluster, or queue reinforces the approved site purpose and entity hierarchy.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Score purpose alignment, entity concentration, lane discipline, buyer clarity, route clarity, and dilution risk.
2. List the items lowering focus.
3. Recommend keep, repair, merge, hold, or block actions.

Return the result with these fields:
- focus score
- purpose alignment
- entity concentration
- lane discipline
- buyer clarity
- route clarity
- dilution risk
- repair action

Control rules:
- Do not use one score to hide conflicting evidence.
- Report the factors and items behind the total.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
28 MP06 · Site protection and link rules

Internal Link Control Pack

Set page-role, target, anchor, commercial-route, and orphan-risk rules before downstream link work begins.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01, C23
Next control routeC27, C28, MP09, MP12
Source-context stateapproved
Best forbriefs, rewrite plans, site architecture, product pages, hub and spoke planning

Control tasks

  • Identify priority link targets and protected pages.
  • Define hub, support, proof, and commercial routes.
  • Define preferred anchors and anchors to avoid.
  • Define source-page and destination-page rules.
  • Flag orphan risks and broken route assumptions.
  • Route link rules into the selected downstream workflow.

Return fields

  • priority target page
  • page role
  • link purpose
  • preferred anchor
  • anchors to avoid
  • source page type
  • destination page type
  • commercial route
  • orphan risk
  • next workflow route

Guardrails

  • Do not build the full internal link map.
  • Do not force a link where the user path or entity relationship is weak.
  • Keep protected-page ownership visible.

Short command

Run Internal Link Control Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Internal Link Control Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Set page-role, target, anchor, commercial-route, and orphan-risk rules before downstream link work begins.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify priority link targets and protected pages.
2. Define hub, support, proof, and commercial routes.
3. Define preferred anchors and anchors to avoid.
4. Define source-page and destination-page rules.
5. Flag orphan risks and broken route assumptions.
6. Route link rules into the selected downstream workflow.

Return the result with these fields:
- priority target page
- page role
- link purpose
- preferred anchor
- anchors to avoid
- source page type
- destination page type
- commercial route
- orphan risk
- next workflow route

Control rules:
- Do not build the full internal link map.
- Do not force a link where the user path or entity relationship is weak.
- Keep protected-page ownership visible.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
29 C23 · Site protection and link rules

Protected Pages

Record pages whose ownership, intent, links, proof, or conversion role must not be damaged by new work.
Single control
PrerequisitesMP02
Next control routeC24, C27
Source-context stateapproved
Best forexisting sites, migration, rewrite programs, map expansion

Control tasks

  • List protected URLs.
  • Record page role, owned intent, primary entity, critical links, and protected elements.
  • Name changes that require review.

Return fields

  • protected URL
  • page role
  • owned intent
  • primary entity
  • protected links
  • protected element
  • change requiring review
  • owner

Guardrails

  • Do not merge or rewrite a protected page without an explicit decision.
  • Keep the canonical owner visible in page-queue review.

Short command

Run Protected Pages for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Protected Pages for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Record pages whose ownership, intent, links, proof, or conversion role must not be damaged by new work.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List protected URLs.
2. Record page role, owned intent, primary entity, critical links, and protected elements.
3. Name changes that require review.

Return the result with these fields:
- protected URL
- page role
- owned intent
- primary entity
- protected links
- protected element
- change requiring review
- owner

Control rules:
- Do not merge or rewrite a protected page without an explicit decision.
- Keep the canonical owner visible in page-queue review.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
30 C24 · Site protection and link rules

Pages to Rewrite

Mark existing pages that keep their URL but need structural, intent, proof, entity, link, or conversion repairs.
Single control
PrerequisitesC23
Next control routeC36, C37
Source-context stateapproved
Best forcontent refresh, site audits, repair queues

Control tasks

  • List rewrite candidates.
  • Record the retained owner and URL.
  • Name the repair reasons and protected elements.
  • Choose rewrite priority and route.

Return fields

  • URL
  • current role
  • retained owner
  • repair reason
  • protected element
  • priority
  • rewrite route
  • approval state

Guardrails

  • Do not rewrite before the owner and keep/remove decisions are approved.
  • Do not change a page role silently.

Short command

Run Pages to Rewrite for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Pages to Rewrite for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Mark existing pages that keep their URL but need structural, intent, proof, entity, link, or conversion repairs.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List rewrite candidates.
2. Record the retained owner and URL.
3. Name the repair reasons and protected elements.
4. Choose rewrite priority and route.

Return the result with these fields:
- URL
- current role
- retained owner
- repair reason
- protected element
- priority
- rewrite route
- approval state

Control rules:
- Do not rewrite before the owner and keep/remove decisions are approved.
- Do not change a page role silently.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
31 C25 · Site protection and link rules

Pages to Merge

Record overlapping pages that should be combined under one canonical owner.
Single control
PrerequisitesC16, C23
Next control routeC36, C37
Source-context stateapproved
Best forcannibalization repair, site consolidation, map cleanup

Control tasks

  • List source and destination URLs.
  • Compare intent, entities, proof, links, and performance evidence.
  • Choose the canonical owner.
  • Record content, redirect, and link-transfer requirements.

Return fields

  • source URL
  • destination URL
  • overlap reason
  • canonical owner
  • content to keep
  • redirect need
  • link transfer
  • approval state

Guardrails

  • Do not merge different user jobs into one mixed-intent page.
  • Do not remove a URL until redirect and link consequences are reviewed.

Short command

Run Pages to Merge for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Pages to Merge for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Record overlapping pages that should be combined under one canonical owner.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List source and destination URLs.
2. Compare intent, entities, proof, links, and performance evidence.
3. Choose the canonical owner.
4. Record content, redirect, and link-transfer requirements.

Return the result with these fields:
- source URL
- destination URL
- overlap reason
- canonical owner
- content to keep
- redirect need
- link transfer
- approval state

Control rules:
- Do not merge different user jobs into one mixed-intent page.
- Do not remove a URL until redirect and link consequences are reviewed.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
32 C26 · Site protection and link rules

Pages to Block

Record page ideas or URLs that must not enter the current site, map, brief, or production queue.
Single control
PrerequisitesC10, C14
Next control routeC15, MP12
Source-context stateapproved
Best forscope control, page queues, AI discovery cleanup

Control tasks

  • List the blocked page or idea.
  • Name the hard boundary or failed fit check.
  • Record any existing owner or off-site route.
  • Set the review condition.

Return fields

  • blocked item
  • blocked URL
  • failed control
  • reason
  • existing owner
  • off-site route
  • review condition
  • owner

Guardrails

  • Do not disguise a blocked idea under a new title.
  • Do not delete a live page without technical and editorial review.

Short command

Run Pages to Block for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Pages to Block for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Record page ideas or URLs that must not enter the current site, map, brief, or production queue.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List the blocked page or idea.
2. Name the hard boundary or failed fit check.
3. Record any existing owner or off-site route.
4. Set the review condition.

Return the result with these fields:
- blocked item
- blocked URL
- failed control
- reason
- existing owner
- off-site route
- review condition
- owner

Control rules:
- Do not disguise a blocked idea under a new title.
- Do not delete a live page without technical and editorial review.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
33 C27 · Site protection and link rules

Internal Link Targets

Create the approved list of pages that downstream maps, briefs, and rewrites should support.
Single control
PrerequisitesC23
Next control routeC28, MP06
Source-context stateapproved
Best forbriefing, rewrite planning, cluster routes

Control tasks

  • List destination URLs.
  • Record role, entity, user need, route purpose, priority, and source-page types.
  • Flag missing or unsuitable destinations.

Return fields

  • target URL
  • page role
  • entity
  • user need
  • link purpose
  • priority
  • source-page type
  • missing-destination flag

Guardrails

  • Do not add a destination that conflicts with page ownership.
  • Do not use generic route descriptions.

Short command

Run Internal Link Targets for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Internal Link Targets for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Create the approved list of pages that downstream maps, briefs, and rewrites should support.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List destination URLs.
2. Record role, entity, user need, route purpose, priority, and source-page types.
3. Flag missing or unsuitable destinations.

Return the result with these fields:
- target URL
- page role
- entity
- user need
- link purpose
- priority
- source-page type
- missing-destination flag

Control rules:
- Do not add a destination that conflicts with page ownership.
- Do not use generic route descriptions.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
34 C28 · Site protection and link rules

Anchor Rules

Set truthful, varied, entity-aware anchor rules for approved internal routes.
Single control
PrerequisitesC27
Next control routeMP06, C37
Source-context stateapproved
Best forcontent briefs, rewrite plans, internal link governance

Control tasks

  • Define preferred anchor patterns.
  • Define anchors to avoid.
  • Map anchors to intent and destination role.
  • Set repetition and placement rules.

Return fields

  • destination
  • preferred anchor
  • alternate anchor
  • intent
  • anchor to avoid
  • placement rule
  • repetition rule
  • review note

Guardrails

  • Do not use anchors that promise a page does not deliver.
  • Avoid generic anchors when a specific destination can be named.

Short command

Run Anchor Rules for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Anchor Rules for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Set truthful, varied, entity-aware anchor rules for approved internal routes.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Define preferred anchor patterns.
2. Define anchors to avoid.
3. Map anchors to intent and destination role.
4. Set repetition and placement rules.

Return the result with these fields:
- destination
- preferred anchor
- alternate anchor
- intent
- anchor to avoid
- placement rule
- repetition rule
- review note

Control rules:
- Do not use anchors that promise a page does not deliver.
- Avoid generic anchors when a specific destination can be named.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
35 MP07 · Proof, tone, and compliance

Proof and Evidence Control Pack

Define approved evidence, unsupported claim rules, first-hand input needs, and proof gaps before production.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01
Next control routeC29, C30, MP09, MP12
Source-context stateapproved
Best forproduct pages, comparison pages, information gain work, high-trust pages, final QA

Control tasks

  • Identify approved and missing proof sources.
  • Identify claims that need support.
  • Identify claims to avoid.
  • Define first-hand input and example needs.
  • Define evidence-quality and citation rules.
  • Route the proof record into the next approved workflow.

Return fields

  • approved proof source
  • missing proof source
  • claim type
  • support needed
  • claim to avoid
  • first-hand input need
  • example source
  • evidence rule
  • risk
  • next workflow route

Guardrails

  • Do not invent proof.
  • Do not move unsupported claims into a brief or draft.
  • Mark time-sensitive facts for current-source review.

Short command

Run Proof and Evidence Control Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Proof and Evidence Control Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Define approved evidence, unsupported claim rules, first-hand input needs, and proof gaps before production.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify approved and missing proof sources.
2. Identify claims that need support.
3. Identify claims to avoid.
4. Define first-hand input and example needs.
5. Define evidence-quality and citation rules.
6. Route the proof record into the next approved workflow.

Return the result with these fields:
- approved proof source
- missing proof source
- claim type
- support needed
- claim to avoid
- first-hand input need
- example source
- evidence rule
- risk
- next workflow route

Control rules:
- Do not invent proof.
- Do not move unsupported claims into a brief or draft.
- Mark time-sensitive facts for current-source review.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
36 MP08 · Proof, tone, and compliance

Tone and Compliance Control Pack

Set voice, reader tone, allowed wording, blocked wording, claims style, and legal or compliance notes before writing starts.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01
Next control routeC31, C32, MP09, MP12
Source-context stateapproved
Best forbrand-sensitive sites, legal review, content teams, rewrite projects, editorial operations

Control tasks

  • Define the brand voice and reader tone.
  • Define allowed and blocked wording.
  • Define claims style and risk language.
  • Record legal, regulatory, accessibility, and editorial notes.
  • Define rewrite rules for non-compliant language.
  • Route the language controls into the next approved workflow.

Return fields

  • brand voice rule
  • reader tone rule
  • allowed phrase
  • blocked phrase
  • claims-style rule
  • compliance note
  • risk note
  • rewrite rule
  • next workflow route

Guardrails

  • Do not create the page copy.
  • Do not let tone rules override source context or factual accuracy.
  • Separate hard restrictions from editorial preferences.

Short command

Run Tone and Compliance Control Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Tone and Compliance Control Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Set voice, reader tone, allowed wording, blocked wording, claims style, and legal or compliance notes before writing starts.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Define the brand voice and reader tone.
2. Define allowed and blocked wording.
3. Define claims style and risk language.
4. Record legal, regulatory, accessibility, and editorial notes.
5. Define rewrite rules for non-compliant language.
6. Route the language controls into the next approved workflow.

Return the result with these fields:
- brand voice rule
- reader tone rule
- allowed phrase
- blocked phrase
- claims-style rule
- compliance note
- risk note
- rewrite rule
- next workflow route

Control rules:
- Do not create the page copy.
- Do not let tone rules override source context or factual accuracy.
- Separate hard restrictions from editorial preferences.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
37 C29 · Proof, tone, and compliance

Proof Source Inventory

Record the evidence sources available to support claims, comparisons, examples, and first-hand observations.
Single control
PrerequisitesMP02
Next control routeC30, MP07
Source-context stateapproved
Best forhigh-trust pages, comparisons, information gain, final QA

Control tasks

  • List each source.
  • Classify source type, owner, date, scope, reliability, and claim support.
  • Mark current, stale, missing, restricted, or review-needed.

Return fields

  • source label
  • source type
  • owner
  • date
  • supported claim
  • scope
  • quality
  • status
  • restriction
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not treat a competitor claim as independent proof.
  • Mark time-sensitive evidence for current review.

Short command

Run Proof Source Inventory for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Proof Source Inventory for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Record the evidence sources available to support claims, comparisons, examples, and first-hand observations.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List each source.
2. Classify source type, owner, date, scope, reliability, and claim support.
3. Mark current, stale, missing, restricted, or review-needed.

Return the result with these fields:
- source label
- source type
- owner
- date
- supported claim
- scope
- quality
- status
- restriction
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not treat a competitor claim as independent proof.
- Mark time-sensitive evidence for current review.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
38 C30 · Proof, tone, and compliance

Claims Guard

Control which factual, comparative, commercial, legal, and performance claims can enter later work.
Single control
PrerequisitesC29
Next control routeMP07, C32, C37
Source-context stateapproved
Best forproduct pages, pricing, comparisons, legal review

Control tasks

  • List proposed claims.
  • Map each claim to evidence.
  • Classify approved, qualified, unsupported, prohibited, or time-sensitive.
  • Write the safe wording rule.

Return fields

  • claim
  • claim type
  • evidence
  • status
  • qualification
  • prohibited wording
  • safe wording rule
  • review owner

Guardrails

  • No ranking, traffic, lead, sale, or rich-result guarantee.
  • Unsupported claims remain blocked.

Short command

Run Claims Guard for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Claims Guard for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Control which factual, comparative, commercial, legal, and performance claims can enter later work.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List proposed claims.
2. Map each claim to evidence.
3. Classify approved, qualified, unsupported, prohibited, or time-sensitive.
4. Write the safe wording rule.

Return the result with these fields:
- claim
- claim type
- evidence
- status
- qualification
- prohibited wording
- safe wording rule
- review owner

Control rules:
- No ranking, traffic, lead, sale, or rich-result guarantee.
- Unsupported claims remain blocked.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
39 C31 · Proof, tone, and compliance

Tone Rules

Set the voice, sentence style, reading level, preferred vocabulary, blocked wording, and CTA style.
Single control
PrerequisitesC01
Next control routeMP08, C32
Source-context stateapproved
Best forcontent teams, brand-sensitive work, rewrites

Control tasks

  • Define the brand voice and reader relationship.
  • Set sentence and paragraph rules.
  • List preferred and blocked terms.
  • Define CTA and correction rules.

Return fields

  • voice rule
  • reader relationship
  • sentence rule
  • reading level
  • preferred term
  • blocked term
  • CTA rule
  • rewrite rule

Guardrails

  • Tone does not override factual precision or accessibility.
  • Separate hard blocks from style preferences.

Short command

Run Tone Rules for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Tone Rules for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Set the voice, sentence style, reading level, preferred vocabulary, blocked wording, and CTA style.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Define the brand voice and reader relationship.
2. Set sentence and paragraph rules.
3. List preferred and blocked terms.
4. Define CTA and correction rules.

Return the result with these fields:
- voice rule
- reader relationship
- sentence rule
- reading level
- preferred term
- blocked term
- CTA rule
- rewrite rule

Control rules:
- Tone does not override factual precision or accessibility.
- Separate hard blocks from style preferences.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
40 C32 · Proof, tone, and compliance

Compliance Notes

Record legal, privacy, accessibility, regulatory, platform, and editorial conditions that affect the project.
Single control
PrerequisitesC10, C30
Next control routeMP08, MP12
Source-context stateapproved
Best forregulated work, legal pages, privacy, accessibility, platform-dependent claims

Control tasks

  • List each condition.
  • Name the affected page types and claims.
  • Record required review, source, owner, and stop condition.
  • Set the update trigger.

Return fields

  • condition
  • affected asset
  • required review
  • required source
  • owner
  • stop condition
  • update trigger
  • approval state

Guardrails

  • Do not present this control record as legal advice.
  • A missing required review remains a blocker.

Short command

Run Compliance Notes for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Compliance Notes for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Record legal, privacy, accessibility, regulatory, platform, and editorial conditions that affect the project.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. List each condition.
2. Name the affected page types and claims.
3. Record required review, source, owner, and stop condition.
4. Set the update trigger.

Return the result with these fields:
- condition
- affected asset
- required review
- required source
- owner
- stop condition
- update trigger
- approval state

Control rules:
- Do not present this control record as legal advice.
- A missing required review remains a blocker.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
41 MP09 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Workflow Routing Pack

Route approved inputs, pages, topics, or findings to the correct MIRENA workflow without starting that work.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01, C14
Next control routeC36, C37, MP12
Source-context stateapproved
Best forlarge projects, multi-team work, page queues, refresh programs, restart sessions

Control tasks

  • Identify the item and its current state.
  • Check source-context and approval status.
  • Choose one route from the approved route list.
  • Record the reason, blocker, and required input.
  • Assign the next owner or action.
  • Prepare a handoff note.

Return fields

  • item
  • item type
  • current state
  • source-context fit
  • route
  • reason
  • blocker
  • required input
  • owner or next action
  • handoff note

Guardrails

  • Only route the work.
  • Do not execute the selected downstream workflow.
  • Schema cues remain blocked until visible copy has human approval.

Short command

Run Workflow Routing Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Workflow Routing Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Route approved inputs, pages, topics, or findings to the correct MIRENA workflow without starting that work.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify the item and its current state.
2. Check source-context and approval status.
3. Choose one route from the approved route list.
4. Record the reason, blocker, and required input.
5. Assign the next owner or action.
6. Prepare a handoff note.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- item type
- current state
- source-context fit
- route
- reason
- blocker
- required input
- owner or next action
- handoff note

Control rules:
- Only route the work.
- Do not execute the selected downstream workflow.
- Schema cues remain blocked until visible copy has human approval.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
42 MP10 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Local Context File Pack

Create a portable plain-text project-state record for later sessions, team handoff, or local archiving.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01
Next control routeC33, C34, C35, MP11
Source-context statedraft
Best forlong projects, team handoff, session continuity, local archive, project restarts

Control tasks

  • Record project identity, site purpose, audience, offer, region, and primary entities.
  • Record allowed and blocked topic lanes.
  • Record page-queue state and protected pages.
  • Record proof, link, tone, and compliance rules.
  • Record approved decisions, open blockers, and current route.
  • Create a copy-ready restart block.

Return fields

  • project identity
  • source-context summary
  • topic-boundary summary
  • page-queue state
  • protected-page state
  • proof and link controls
  • tone and compliance controls
  • approved decisions
  • open blockers
  • current workflow route
  • restart block

Guardrails

  • Do not include passwords, payment data, or restricted client material.
  • Mark unresolved decisions as pending rather than silently treating them as approved.
  • Do not start the next workflow.

Short command

Run Local Context File Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Local Context File Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Create a portable plain-text project-state record for later sessions, team handoff, or local archiving.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Record project identity, site purpose, audience, offer, region, and primary entities.
2. Record allowed and blocked topic lanes.
3. Record page-queue state and protected pages.
4. Record proof, link, tone, and compliance rules.
5. Record approved decisions, open blockers, and current route.
6. Create a copy-ready restart block.

Return the result with these fields:
- project identity
- source-context summary
- topic-boundary summary
- page-queue state
- protected-page state
- proof and link controls
- tone and compliance controls
- approved decisions
- open blockers
- current workflow route
- restart block

Control rules:
- Do not include passwords, payment data, or restricted client material.
- Mark unresolved decisions as pending rather than silently treating them as approved.
- Do not start the next workflow.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
43 MP11 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Project Restart Pack

Restore a saved project safely, verify what is still current, and identify the next incomplete control gate.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP10
Next control routeC35, C34, MP12
Source-context statedraft
Best fornew sessions, project pauses, team changes, large audits, multi-stage delivery

Control tasks

  • Load the saved context file and previous approved outputs.
  • Compare saved state with current files, URLs, rules, and project goals.
  • Mark current, stale, conflicting, missing, and review-needed records.
  • Restore approved decisions without repeating completed work.
  • Identify the next incomplete control gate.
  • Create the restart handoff.

Return fields

  • restored project identity
  • current records
  • stale records
  • conflicts
  • missing inputs
  • approved decisions restored
  • next incomplete gate
  • restart blocker
  • next setup route

Guardrails

  • Do not assume a saved record is still current.
  • Do not overwrite a newer approved decision with an older local file.
  • Do not skip setup QA after a major project change.

Short command

Run Project Restart Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Project Restart Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Restore a saved project safely, verify what is still current, and identify the next incomplete control gate.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Load the saved context file and previous approved outputs.
2. Compare saved state with current files, URLs, rules, and project goals.
3. Mark current, stale, conflicting, missing, and review-needed records.
4. Restore approved decisions without repeating completed work.
5. Identify the next incomplete control gate.
6. Create the restart handoff.

Return the result with these fields:
- restored project identity
- current records
- stale records
- conflicts
- missing inputs
- approved decisions restored
- next incomplete gate
- restart blocker
- next setup route

Control rules:
- Do not assume a saved record is still current.
- Do not overwrite a newer approved decision with an older local file.
- Do not skip setup QA after a major project change.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
44 MP12 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Final Setup Validation Pack

Run the final project-control gate and stop downstream work when any blocking setup field remains incomplete.
Master pack
PrerequisitesMP01, C36, C38
Next control routeC37
Source-context stateapproved
Best forfinal setup review, client sign-off, team handoff, project restart, pre-production gate

Control tasks

  • Check the thirteen setup-gate fields.
  • Separate complete, incomplete, conflicting, and review-needed fields.
  • Confirm page-queue, link, proof, tone, compliance, and route controls.
  • Confirm approval ownership and open blockers.
  • Issue pass, revise, hold, or fail.
  • Prepare the next-workflow handoff only after a pass.

Return fields

  • setup field
  • status
  • evidence
  • conflict
  • blocking gap
  • review-needed item
  • setup decision
  • approval owner
  • next workflow route
  • handoff readiness

Guardrails

  • Do not pass when a core source-context field is missing.
  • Do not treat optional polish as a substitute for missing project purpose or boundaries.
  • Do not start the next workflow.

Short command

Run Final Setup Validation Pack for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Final Setup Validation Pack for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Run the final project-control gate and stop downstream work when any blocking setup field remains incomplete.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Check the thirteen setup-gate fields.
2. Separate complete, incomplete, conflicting, and review-needed fields.
3. Confirm page-queue, link, proof, tone, compliance, and route controls.
4. Confirm approval ownership and open blockers.
5. Issue pass, revise, hold, or fail.
6. Prepare the next-workflow handoff only after a pass.

Return the result with these fields:
- setup field
- status
- evidence
- conflict
- blocking gap
- review-needed item
- setup decision
- approval owner
- next workflow route
- handoff readiness

Control rules:
- Do not pass when a core source-context field is missing.
- Do not treat optional polish as a substitute for missing project purpose or boundaries.
- Do not start the next workflow.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
45 C33 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Local Context File Builder

Create the portable local project-state file without starting a new analysis pass.
Single control
PrerequisitesMP10
Next control routeC34, C35
Source-context statedraft
Best forsaving project state, team handoff, session continuity

Control tasks

  • Assemble approved context, boundaries, queue state, protected pages, proof, links, tone, compliance, route, and blockers.
  • Add version and approval status.
  • Create a compact restart block.

Return fields

  • local context file
  • version
  • approval state
  • open blockers
  • current route
  • restart block

Guardrails

  • Exclude sensitive credentials and restricted data.
  • Do not mark pending fields approved.

Short command

Run Local Context File Builder for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Local Context File Builder for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Create the portable local project-state file without starting a new analysis pass.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Assemble approved context, boundaries, queue state, protected pages, proof, links, tone, compliance, route, and blockers.
2. Add version and approval status.
3. Create a compact restart block.

Return the result with these fields:
- local context file
- version
- approval state
- open blockers
- current route
- restart block

Control rules:
- Exclude sensitive credentials and restricted data.
- Do not mark pending fields approved.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
46 C34 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Master Context Update

Apply approved changes to the master context while preserving version history and unresolved conflicts.
Single control
PrerequisitesC33
Next control routeC35, MP12
Source-context statedraft
Best forscope changes, new offers, team changes, project refresh

Control tasks

  • Compare proposed changes with the current master context.
  • Classify add, replace, deprecate, conflict, or pending.
  • Record reason, approver, and affected workflows.
  • Issue a new version.

Return fields

  • field
  • old value
  • proposed value
  • change type
  • reason
  • approver
  • affected workflow
  • conflict
  • new version

Guardrails

  • Only approved changes can replace the master value.
  • Keep the previous version and conflict record.

Short command

Run Master Context Update for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Master Context Update for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Apply approved changes to the master context while preserving version history and unresolved conflicts.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Compare proposed changes with the current master context.
2. Classify add, replace, deprecate, conflict, or pending.
3. Record reason, approver, and affected workflows.
4. Issue a new version.

Return the result with these fields:
- field
- old value
- proposed value
- change type
- reason
- approver
- affected workflow
- conflict
- new version

Control rules:
- Only approved changes can replace the master value.
- Keep the previous version and conflict record.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
47 C35 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Session Restart Setup

Prepare the exact context, completed gates, open blockers, and next module for a new MIRENA session.
Single control
PrerequisitesC33, C34
Next control routeMP11, C36
Source-context statedraft
Best fornew chat sessions, handoff, long projects

Control tasks

  • Load the latest approved context version.
  • List completed controls and outputs.
  • List open blockers and pending approvals.
  • Name the next module and required input.
  • Create the restart prompt.

Return fields

  • context version
  • completed controls
  • approved outputs
  • open blockers
  • pending approvals
  • next module
  • required input
  • restart prompt

Guardrails

  • Do not repeat completed work unless a relevant input changed.
  • Do not skip the next incomplete gate.

Short command

Run Session Restart Setup for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Session Restart Setup for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Prepare the exact context, completed gates, open blockers, and next module for a new MIRENA session.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Load the latest approved context version.
2. List completed controls and outputs.
3. List open blockers and pending approvals.
4. Name the next module and required input.
5. Create the restart prompt.

Return the result with these fields:
- context version
- completed controls
- approved outputs
- open blockers
- pending approvals
- next module
- required input
- restart prompt

Control rules:
- Do not repeat completed work unless a relevant input changed.
- Do not skip the next incomplete gate.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
48 C36 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Next Workflow Route

Choose the next MIRENA workflow for one approved item and state the required input and owner.
Single control
PrerequisitesC14
Next control routeC37, C38
Source-context stateapproved
Best forfinal setup, multi-workflow projects, handoff

Control tasks

  • Identify the approved item and current state.
  • Choose one route.
  • Record the route reason, required input, owner, blocker, and stop condition.
  • Prepare the handoff note.

Return fields

  • item
  • current state
  • selected route
  • reason
  • required input
  • owner
  • blocker
  • stop condition
  • handoff note

Guardrails

  • Do not run the selected workflow.
  • Schema cues remain blocked until approved visible copy exists.

Short command

Run Next Workflow Route for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Next Workflow Route for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Choose the next MIRENA workflow for one approved item and state the required input and owner.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Identify the approved item and current state.
2. Choose one route.
3. Record the route reason, required input, owner, blocker, and stop condition.
4. Prepare the handoff note.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- current state
- selected route
- reason
- required input
- owner
- blocker
- stop condition
- handoff note

Control rules:
- Do not run the selected workflow.
- Schema cues remain blocked until approved visible copy exists.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
49 C37 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Handoff Contract

Create the formal contract between the approved setup and one downstream workflow.
Single control
PrerequisitesC36, C38
Next control routeApproved downstream handoff
Source-context stateapproved
Best forteam delivery, content briefs, rewrites, maps, link work

Control tasks

  • Name the item, source-context version, approval state, route, owner, required input, expected output, exclusions, proof, links, and return condition.
  • Record the acceptance gate.

Return fields

  • item
  • source-context version
  • approval state
  • route
  • owner
  • required input
  • expected output
  • exclusions
  • proof requirements
  • link requirements
  • acceptance gate

Guardrails

  • Do not hand off an unapproved item.
  • Do not let the downstream workflow change source context silently.

Short command

Run Handoff Contract for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Handoff Contract for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Create the formal contract between the approved setup and one downstream workflow.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Name the item, source-context version, approval state, route, owner, required input, expected output, exclusions, proof, links, and return condition.
2. Record the acceptance gate.

Return the result with these fields:
- item
- source-context version
- approval state
- route
- owner
- required input
- expected output
- exclusions
- proof requirements
- link requirements
- acceptance gate

Control rules:
- Do not hand off an unapproved item.
- Do not let the downstream workflow change source context silently.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
50 C38 · State, handoff, and setup QA

Setup QA

Check the complete setup record for missing fields, contradictions, unapproved decisions, and route gaps.
Single control
PrerequisitesC01, C36
Next control routeMP12, C37
Source-context stateapproved
Best forfinal setup, client review, restart validation

Control tasks

  • Check all thirteen setup-gate fields.
  • Check module completion, evidence, conflicts, and approval state.
  • Return pass, revise, hold, or fail.
  • List the exact repair modules.

Return fields

  • setup field
  • status
  • evidence
  • conflict
  • approval state
  • blocking gap
  • repair module
  • setup decision
  • next route

Guardrails

  • Do not pass when a core field is missing.
  • Do not start downstream work inside QA.

Short command

Run Setup QA for [TARGET].

Expanded prompt

Run Setup QA for this project.

Use the source context before making any decision.
Current source-context state: [SOURCE_CONTEXT_STATUS]
Current asset type: [ASSET_TYPE]
Current target, file, URL, queue, or project note: [TARGET]
Requested downstream route: [DESIRED_ROUTE]

Control purpose:
Check the complete setup record for missing fields, contradictions, unapproved decisions, and route gaps.

Complete these tasks in order:
1. Check all thirteen setup-gate fields.
2. Check module completion, evidence, conflicts, and approval state.
3. Return pass, revise, hold, or fail.
4. List the exact repair modules.

Return the result with these fields:
- setup field
- status
- evidence
- conflict
- approval state
- blocking gap
- repair module
- setup decision
- next route

Control rules:
- Do not pass when a core field is missing.
- Do not start downstream work inside QA.
- Separate approved, blocked, and review-needed items.
- Give a reason for every hold, rejection, or route.
- Do not start the downstream workflow inside this control prompt.
- Keep approval gates sequential.
Workflow ownership

Project control has one job: prepare and govern the handoff.

Keeping each page role distinct prevents a setup prompt from turning into a topical map, brief, draft, or schema task.

01 · Build the profile

Source Context Template

Creates the reusable site, audience, offer, entity, boundary, inventory, proof, voice, and output record.

Build source context →
02 · Govern setup

Project Control Library

Approves lanes, page queues, protected owners, proof, links, language, project state, setup QA, and handoff.

Build a control prompt →
03 · Choose across MIRENA

Workflow Routing Library

Selects the next module across the wider MIRENA system after project control has recorded the route and approval state.

Open workflow routing →
04 · Execute approved work

Downstream workflow

Runs mapping, briefing, rewriting, link mapping, information gain, SERP planning, or final QA under the handoff contract.

Compare output contracts →
Route-only handoff

A route names the next workflow. It does not run it.

The selected route needs an approved item, required input, owner, blocker state, and handoff note.

RouteMinimum handoff conditionDestination
Topical Maps and PlanningApproved page and cluster decisionsOpen route →
Raw Semantic DiscoveryUpstream evidence collection without page approvalOpen route →
Content BriefsApproved page purpose, entities, proof, links, and formatOpen route →
Drafting and RewritingApproved brief or approved repair planOpen route →
Entity SEO and SalienceApproved entity problem or page-level entity taskOpen route →
Internal LinkingApproved page ownership and route rulesOpen route →
Information GainApproved page owner and proof-ready differentiation taskOpen route →
SERP Feature PlanningApproved page and search-format targetOpen route →
Schema CuesHuman-approved visible copy onlyOpen route →
Final QAComplete page package and evidenceOpen route →
HoldMissing input, proof, owner, approval, or routeOpen route →
RejectHard boundary or failed project fitOpen route →
Common questions

Source context and project-control prompt FAQ

What is the MIRENA project-control prompt library?

It is the setup and governance layer that defines the site, audience, offer, entities, topic boundaries, page-queue rules, protected pages, proof, internal links, language rules, and next route before production begins.

Why does this rebuild contain 50 modules when the old title said 30?

The visible inventory contains twelve master prompt packs and thirty-eight single controls. The rebuilt title, filters, exports, and module numbering use the complete fifty-module count.

When should I use a master pack?

Use a master pack when several related setup tasks share the same context and belong inside one control layer. Keep approval gates, page decisions, briefing, drafting, schema cues, and final QA in their own sequence.

When should I use a single control?

Use a single control when one decision needs precision, evidence, a named owner, or a clear audit record. Examples include Buyer Fit Check, Page versus Section Guard, Claims Guard, or Next Workflow Route.

How is this page different from the Source Context Template?

The template builds the reusable project profile. This page selects and runs the controls that approve topic lanes, page queues, protected pages, proof, links, language, project state, and handoff.

How is this page different from the Workflow Routing prompt page?

This page chooses controls inside the source-context and project-governance layer. The broader routing library chooses a module across the full MIRENA system after this setup layer has passed.

Why must approval gates stay sequential?

A later output depends on an earlier decision. A page must be approved before it is briefed, a brief before it is drafted, and visible copy before final schema work. Combining those gates removes the evidence trail.

Can I import the JSON from the Source Context Template?

Yes. The console reads the local JSON inside the browser tab and adds a compact context summary to the selected prompt. Review the approval status before using an approval or handoff module.

Does the console submit or retain project information?

No. The standalone console has no form endpoint, network request, or browser-storage call. Copy and downloads are created locally in the browser.

When can schema cues run?

Schema cues can be routed only after setup QA, the relevant writing workflow, final QA, and human approval of the visible copy. This project-control page records the route but does not create final structured data.

Control the project before MIRENA creates the output.

Build the source context, choose the smallest matching control, pass all thirteen setup checks, and hand one approved item into one named workflow.