Processed topical map
A site planning package with boundaries, inventory, page roles, gaps, links, sequence, and overlap decisions.
- planning stage
- cluster output
- brief input
What the system returns
The output changes with the job. A topic can return a processed map. An approved page decision can return a brief or draft. An existing URL can return an audit and rewrite pack.
Eight output families
MIRENA does not need to return an article when the correct result is a map, brief, audit, link plan, or hold decision.
A site planning package with boundaries, inventory, page roles, gaps, links, sequence, and overlap decisions.
A page operating plan covering the entity model, intent, user state, passages, proof, format, links, and CTA.
A draft built from an approved page plan rather than a loose prompt.
A revised asset plus structure, change notes, metadata, links, routes, and open issues.
A diagnosis of purpose, ownership, entity, intent, structure, proof, link, and user route failures.
Source, target, relationship, anchor purpose, passage placement, and user route recommendations.
Approved answer formats such as definitions, lists, questions, comparisons, processes, and evidence blocks.
Entity, property, relationship, URL, and validation notes for later structured data work.
Handoff package
Project, URL, topic, query, owner, and workflow stage.
What was approved, rejected, held, or sent for review.
Sources used, missing evidence, confidence, and risk.
Map, brief, draft, rewrite, audit, link plan, or content block.
Claims, proof, links, approvals, technical needs, and later cues.
Named workflow, owner, blocker, and expected handoff.
Workflow position
Set the site, audience, offer, constraints, and desired job.
Plan, brief, draft, rewrite, audit, or route links.
Approve the visible output and send it to the named next stage.
Questions
MIRENA can return processed topical maps, content briefs, drafts, rewrite packs, audits, internal link plans, search format blocks, and later schema cues.
No. The output depends on the job, source context, evidence, current stage, and approved next route.
No. Facts, claims, links, accessibility, legal risk, editorial quality, and technical implementation still need review.
Source context controls the site, offer, audience, topic boundary, protected pages, proof, and desired route.
Yes. Missing evidence, overlap, wrong page ownership, unsupported claims, or a changed goal can return work to intake or planning.
Next route
Keep unresolved evidence, claims, links, ownership, and approval needs visible.