Skip to main content

  1. MIRENA
  2. Compliance
  3. Human Approval Policy

Compliance · Governance standard

Approval names the exact object, authority, scope, evidence, and action being accepted.

The policy separates review from approval, content approval from specialist approval, and written-draft approval from schema, deployment, and publication authorization.

Governance standard

Semantec SEO Human Approval and Release Policy

The standard states what must happen, who owns the decision, what evidence is required, and what blocks release.

01 · Separate roles

Review and approval are different

A reviewer checks an asset against a defined standard. An approver has authority to accept the identified version and permit a stated downstream action.

Passing editorial QA does not authorise legal publication, deploy code, spend money, or bind a client.

02 · Freeze the object

Approval object

The record must identify the exact page, file, package, code version, dataset, policy, or release candidate. A title or shared document link is not enough when the content can change.

Use a version, checksum, immutable export, timestamp, or controlled revision.

03 · Name the owner

Approval authority

Typical approval owners
Decision Typical approver What the approval covers
Company identity Company or founder owner Names, roles, relationships, facts
Product and pricing Product and commercial owner Capability, plan, price, tax, access, and offer
Legal terms Accountable legal reviewer and business owner Operative clauses and release
Privacy and security Privacy or security owner Data flow, controls, providers, rights, and incident routes
Accessibility Accessibility and implementation owner Content and target-environment acceptance
Written content Editor and subject owner Visible claims, structure, sources, and links
Schema Schema and entity owner after content approval Final JSON-LD consistency
Deployment Authorised site operator Target environment, rollback, and release
04 · Approve visible content first

Written-draft hard gate

The complete visible draft must receive explicit approval before final publishable structured data or final publishing authorization.

Candidate types, properties, cues, and placeholders may be prepared earlier, but they are not the final graph.

05 · Match competence

Specialist review

Legal, privacy, security, accessibility, product, commercial, technical, medical, financial, employment, or other specialist subjects require an approver with suitable authority and competence.

A general editor cannot approve a specialist claim merely because the wording is clear.

06 · Define the boundary

Approval scope and exclusions

Record the sections, claims, assets, links, countries, languages, devices, environments, and actions covered. List any held claim, untested function, unresolved source, or excluded route.

An approval with an exclusion must remain visibly qualified through the handoff.

07 · Use explicit states

Decision states

The approver may accept, accept with qualification, return for repair, request evidence, require specialist review, block, reject, or defer until evidence can exist.

A module, model, writer, or reviewer cannot self-approve a failed validation.

08 · Reopen only what changed

Reapproval triggers

A material change to a fact, source, price, offer, product, provider, policy, law, entity, link, code, structured data, environment, or page role reopens affected approvals.

Minor spelling or formatting changes do not automatically reopen unrelated decisions.

09 · Control the external action

Release authorization

Publication requires an authorised person, target environment, rollback snapshot, route-conflict check, asset check, rendered QA, and a post-release verification plan.

A draft-import package or CMS success message is not publication approval.

10 · Make approval auditable

Approval record

Store the approver, authority, date, version, scope, evidence, conditions, exclusions, decision, and next action. Preserve a history when a later decision supersedes the approval.

Sources

Controlling guidance and first-party records.

The standard uses current source material but does not convert platform guidance into a ranking guarantee.

Semantec SEO
MIRENA workflow

First-party written-draft, publish, and handoff gates.

Open source →

Semantec SEO
MIRENA outputs

First-party human-review and output-state boundary.

Open source →

Google Search Central
Google structured-data policies

Official visible-content consistency expectation.

Open source →