- MIRENA
- Compliance
- Human Approval Policy
Compliance · Governance standard
Approval names the exact object, authority, scope, evidence, and action being accepted.
The policy separates review from approval, content approval from specialist approval, and written-draft approval from schema, deployment, and publication authorization.
Semantec SEO Human Approval and Release Policy
The standard states what must happen, who owns the decision, what evidence is required, and what blocks release.
Review and approval are different
A reviewer checks an asset against a defined standard. An approver has authority to accept the identified version and permit a stated downstream action.
Passing editorial QA does not authorise legal publication, deploy code, spend money, or bind a client.
Approval object
The record must identify the exact page, file, package, code version, dataset, policy, or release candidate. A title or shared document link is not enough when the content can change.
Use a version, checksum, immutable export, timestamp, or controlled revision.
Approval authority
| Decision | Typical approver | What the approval covers |
|---|---|---|
| Company identity | Company or founder owner | Names, roles, relationships, facts |
| Product and pricing | Product and commercial owner | Capability, plan, price, tax, access, and offer |
| Legal terms | Accountable legal reviewer and business owner | Operative clauses and release |
| Privacy and security | Privacy or security owner | Data flow, controls, providers, rights, and incident routes |
| Accessibility | Accessibility and implementation owner | Content and target-environment acceptance |
| Written content | Editor and subject owner | Visible claims, structure, sources, and links |
| Schema | Schema and entity owner after content approval | Final JSON-LD consistency |
| Deployment | Authorised site operator | Target environment, rollback, and release |
Written-draft hard gate
The complete visible draft must receive explicit approval before final publishable structured data or final publishing authorization.
Candidate types, properties, cues, and placeholders may be prepared earlier, but they are not the final graph.
Specialist review
Legal, privacy, security, accessibility, product, commercial, technical, medical, financial, employment, or other specialist subjects require an approver with suitable authority and competence.
A general editor cannot approve a specialist claim merely because the wording is clear.
Approval scope and exclusions
Record the sections, claims, assets, links, countries, languages, devices, environments, and actions covered. List any held claim, untested function, unresolved source, or excluded route.
An approval with an exclusion must remain visibly qualified through the handoff.
Decision states
The approver may accept, accept with qualification, return for repair, request evidence, require specialist review, block, reject, or defer until evidence can exist.
A module, model, writer, or reviewer cannot self-approve a failed validation.
Reapproval triggers
A material change to a fact, source, price, offer, product, provider, policy, law, entity, link, code, structured data, environment, or page role reopens affected approvals.
Minor spelling or formatting changes do not automatically reopen unrelated decisions.
Release authorization
Publication requires an authorised person, target environment, rollback snapshot, route-conflict check, asset check, rendered QA, and a post-release verification plan.
A draft-import package or CMS success message is not publication approval.
Approval record
Store the approver, authority, date, version, scope, evidence, conditions, exclusions, decision, and next action. Preserve a history when a later decision supersedes the approval.
Controlling guidance and first-party records.
The standard uses current source material but does not convert platform guidance into a ranking guarantee.
MIRENA workflow
First-party written-draft, publish, and handoff gates.
MIRENA outputs
First-party human-review and output-state boundary.
Google structured-data policies
Official visible-content consistency expectation.
Continue to the owner of the next control.
Claims, sources, AI review, approval, corrections, conflicts, and rights requests remain separate decisions.
Owned route
MIRENA Human Review
Product documentation for review and hard gates.
Open route →
Owned route
AI Output Review
Review stages before approval.
Open route →
Owned route
Editorial Standards
Publication quality and maintenance.
Open route →
Owned route
Claims and Substantiation
Evidence requirements before approval.
Open route →
Owned route
Corrections Policy
Post-approval error and change handling.
Open route →
Owned route
Legal Hub
Operative legal documents requiring specialist approval.
Open route →