Confirm the review baseline
MIRENA pairs the draft with the approved brief version and resolved decision record.
Review handoff
An editor should not spend the first review pass reconstructing the page goal, sources, section roles, proof needs, links, and unresolved decisions. MIRENA packages the approved brief, draft, claim list, source record, change log, review scope, and decision states together.
How MIRENA handles Brief Handoffs to Editors
MIRENA pairs the draft with the approved brief version and resolved decision record.
Purpose, intent, reader, entity center, section roles, formats, and next action are checked against the brief.
Claims, figures, examples, sources, missing inputs, and restricted material receive a status.
Opening, order, tables, questions, transitions, parent links, sibling links, proof links, and next action routes are checked.
Every issue receives severity, owner, action, location, source need, and acceptance condition.
The editor packet ends in approve, revision needed, or hold with the next handoff named.
Brief fields
The planning baseline used for review.
The submitted draft and the writer decisions that changed the approved plan.
Structure, facts, proof, links, tone, accessibility, or another named review role.
Every important claim with its evidence and status.
Opening, section order, formats, repetition, transitions, and closing route.
Required, missing, misplaced, or incorrect routes.
Severity, owner, action, location, evidence need, and acceptance condition.
Approve, revision needed, or hold with the next owner.
Illustrative MIRENA output
The packet lets the editor review against the approved page plan rather than personal preference. The example shows structure rather than a client result or search performance claim.
Approved deep brief version three
Writer moved the comparison table one block earlier
Structure accepted, two claims need source support
Missing parent Content Briefs route
Revision needed
Writer for sources and strategist for the parent link
What MIRENA blocks
The editor sees the draft without the approved planning baseline.
No named scope separates factual, structural, brand, link, and legal review.
The team cannot distinguish blockers from preferences.
Important statements have no evidence status.
The draft is edited in isolation from the site route.
The document cycles through comments with no approval decision.
Related MIRENA routes
Review how the brief reached approved state.
Open the routeRoute upstream brief issues into owned changes.
Open the routeReturn a clean production packet when the brief itself changes.
Open the routeMove the approved review into final page production.
Open the routeQuestions
The draft, approved brief, source pack, change record, claim list, open risks, review scope, and decision states.
No. MIRENA gives the editor the approved page job, structure, formats, proof, and links as the review baseline.
Every issue receives a severity, owner, action, location, source need, and acceptance condition.
The editor can approve, request revision, or place the work on hold.
The issue moves back to brief revision and approval before the production draft continues.
Next route
Founder access is €20 per 30 days excluding VAT for one seat and one active MIRENA instance. OpenAI account rules and usage limits remain separate.
MIRENA output requires factual, editorial, legal, technical, and business review before publication or client delivery.