How MIRENA Hands a Draft and Brief to an Editor

Review handoff

MIRENA hands editors a review frame with decisions separated from open risks.

An editor should not spend the first review pass reconstructing the page goal, sources, section roles, proof needs, links, and unresolved decisions. MIRENA packages the approved brief, draft, claim list, source record, change log, review scope, and decision states together.

Static explanation Native disclosure controls Current MIRENA routes Human review required
Baseline Approved brief
Core review Structure, proof, links, claims
States Approve, revise, hold
Output Owned issue queue

How MIRENA handles Brief Handoffs to Editors

Six stages move the evidence into an approved brief or handoff.

Confirm the review baseline

MIRENA pairs the draft with the approved brief version and resolved decision record.

Compare the page job

Purpose, intent, reader, entity center, section roles, formats, and next action are checked against the brief.

Review facts and proof

Claims, figures, examples, sources, missing inputs, and restricted material receive a status.

Review structure and links

Opening, order, tables, questions, transitions, parent links, sibling links, proof links, and next action routes are checked.

Create the issue queue

Every issue receives severity, owner, action, location, source need, and acceptance condition.

Return the decision

The editor packet ends in approve, revision needed, or hold with the next handoff named.

Brief fields

The brief records the decisions the writer and editor should not have to rediscover.

Brief field Approved brief version

The planning baseline used for review.

Brief field Draft and change record

The submitted draft and the writer decisions that changed the approved plan.

Brief field Review scope

Structure, facts, proof, links, tone, accessibility, or another named review role.

Brief field Claim and source list

Every important claim with its evidence and status.

Brief field Structural checks

Opening, section order, formats, repetition, transitions, and closing route.

Brief field Internal link checks

Required, missing, misplaced, or incorrect routes.

Brief field Issue queue

Severity, owner, action, location, evidence need, and acceptance condition.

Brief field Decision state

Approve, revision needed, or hold with the next owner.

Illustrative MIRENA output

Illustrative editor handoff packet

The packet lets the editor review against the approved page plan rather than personal preference. The example shows structure rather than a client result or search performance claim.

Baseline

Approved deep brief version three

Draft change

Writer moved the comparison table one block earlier

Review result

Structure accepted, two claims need source support

Link issue

Missing parent Content Briefs route

State

Revision needed

Owner

Writer for sources and strategist for the parent link

What MIRENA blocks

The brief stays upstream when these planning problems remain open.

Blocker Brief missing

The editor sees the draft without the approved planning baseline.

Blocker Review everything

No named scope separates factual, structural, brand, link, and legal review.

Blocker Comments without severity

The team cannot distinguish blockers from preferences.

Blocker Claims without sources

Important statements have no evidence status.

Blocker Link review omitted

The draft is edited in isolation from the site route.

Blocker No final owner

The document cycles through comments with no approval decision.

Related MIRENA routes

Move the approved work into the smallest useful next route.

Planning baseline

Brief Approval Flow

Review how the brief reached approved state.

Open the route
Issue repair

Brief Revision Process

Route upstream brief issues into owned changes.

Open the route
Writer loop

Brief Handoffs to Writers

Return a clean production packet when the brief itself changes.

Open the route
Production

Drafting and Rewriting

Move the approved review into final page production.

Open the route

Questions

Brief Handoffs to Editors questions.

What should an editor receive?

The draft, approved brief, source pack, change record, claim list, open risks, review scope, and decision states.

Should an editor review against personal preference?

No. MIRENA gives the editor the approved page job, structure, formats, proof, and links as the review baseline.

How are editor comments handled?

Every issue receives a severity, owner, action, location, source need, and acceptance condition.

What decisions can the editor return?

The editor can approve, request revision, or place the work on hold.

What happens when the brief itself is wrong?

The issue moves back to brief revision and approval before the production draft continues.

Next route

Give MIRENA the source context and evidence. Receive the controlled brief or handoff.

Founder access is €20 per 30 days excluding VAT for one seat and one active MIRENA instance. OpenAI account rules and usage limits remain separate.

MIRENA output requires factual, editorial, legal, technical, and business review before publication or client delivery.