The entity and its defining support should form a readable unit
The right distance depends on the question, format, and amount of explanation the reader needs.
Semantic separation review · Entity SEO
MIRENA maps the primary entity, marks its defining attributes, relationships, examples, evidence, and next routes, then checks how far those signals have drifted across paragraphs, sections, headings, and the wider cluster.
Definition and evidence boundary
The problem is not a fixed word count. It is the loss of a clear local relationship between an entity and the support the reader needs.
The right distance depends on the question, format, and amount of explanation the reader needs.
An asset can have a clear opening and still scatter attributes, examples, or sibling paths later.
The issue receives a target block, movement instruction, bridge, source need, owner, and review state.
MIRENA internal workflow
The workflow prevents arbitrary spacing rules, overloaded openings, distant examples, fragmented sections, and internal links that arrive before the current concept is grounded.
MIRENA fixes the query, audience, completion event, source context, page owner, and approved cluster boundary.
Attributes, relationships, examples, evidence, comparisons, questions, and next routes are attached to the entity they support.
The title, opening, headings, paragraphs, components, summary, anchors, and sibling pages are recorded.
Each issue becomes delayed definition, detached attribute, distant example, fragmented explanation, early route, or cluster separation.
MIRENA moves, groups, bridges, reformats, links, splits, compresses, or holds the affected material.
The approved repairs receive target sections, source needs, owners, review conditions, and the next workflow.
Six distance failure types
The entity appears before the asset explains what it means in the approved frame.
A defining property, function, limit, input, or output sits far from the entity.
The scenario or proof appears after the reader has lost the concept it supports.
One answer is split across several sections with no clear bridge or summary.
A link sends the reader away before the current entity and question are grounded.
A support asset exists but the hub, sibling, or link path does not reveal the relationship.
Eight distance review dimensions
Does the entity receive enough meaning when it first appears?
How far are the defining properties and functions from the entity?
Does the example sit beside the explanation it makes concrete?
Must the reader combine several blocks before the answer becomes complete?
Do the headings move from entity to support in a logical sequence?
Does the link appear after the need for deeper coverage becomes clear?
Would pulling support closer improve clarity without crowding the passage?
Does another asset own depth that should be reached through a cleaner route?
Eight distance repair actions
Place the working explanation in the first useful block after the entity appears.
Keep properties, functions, limits, and examples near the entity they define.
Place the supporting material beside the claim, process, or decision it supports.
Bring parts of one answer into one coherent section or component.
Explain how the current entity connects to the next support concept or section.
Keep the reader on the current concept until the deeper need is established.
Send distinct depth to the approved page that owns it instead of widening the asset.
Stop when the page owner, support role, source, or canonical route remains unresolved.
Examples
The entity is named, then broad background fills several paragraphs before the definition appears.
Define the entity first, add the closest attribute, and delay wider context until the frame is stable.
The compared entities appear early, while the criteria and recommendation arrive much later.
Keep the comparison frame, criteria, tradeoffs, and decision summary inside the same section sequence.
The workflow names an input and only explains its role after several unrelated steps.
Place the input, owner, gate, output, and handoff inside the step where the relationship matters.
A sibling link appears in the intro before the current topic has been explained.
Move the link to the section where the reader reaches the deeper entity or next task.
Related workflows
Designs the desired closeness between an entity and its support.
Turns the distance diagnosis into a regrouping target.
Builds the local meaning block around an important mention.
Repairs sentence, paragraph, and section opening distance.
Assigns entities and support to visible page zones.
Repairs high value and section level separation.
Gives each section one owner and nearby support.
Repairs fragmentation across long or mixed blocks.
Adds the attributes, relationships, examples, evidence, and routes the entity needs.
Prevents close placement from remaining shallow.
Connects the asset to the hub, siblings, proof, and next task.
Repairs distance across the site and reader journey.
Ownership and production decisions
The support directly defines or develops the current entity and question.
The support belongs to the same page job but another section or component.
Another approved page owns the deeper entity or user task.
The material is irrelevant, unsupported, duplicated, private, or unresolved.
Common mistakes
Different questions and formats need different amounts of local context.
Closer support should remain readable and ordered.
The reader still needs to understand how the pieces connect.
Close placement around the wrong entity does not repair the page owner.
The current answer should be grounded before the next route appears.
A sibling page may be correct when the internal route makes the relationship visible.
MIRENA outputs
Entity, support type, current location, expected location, section job, and source.
Review the routeMention, supporting signal, separation type, reader impact, severity, and owner.
Review the routeDefinition, attributes, example, evidence, comparison, and question movement instructions.
Review the routeHeading path, combined blocks, bridge copy, section owner, and next exit.
Review the routeSource section, target asset, anchor direction, timing, and journey reason.
Review the routeAccepted, held, rejected, blocked, and review needed repairs with owners and workflows.
Review the routeEntity SEO routes
Design how close the entity and its defining support should sit.
Review the routeBuild a complete local meaning block around the important mention.
Review the routeGive the section one owner, nearby support, a boundary, and a clean exit.
Review the routeApply the approved movement, bridge, section, and route changes to a live asset.
Review the routeQuestions
Entity distance is the separation between an entity and the support that explains or connects it.
No. MIRENA uses distance as an editorial and structural review model, not a disclosed Search metric.
Distance describes the separation problem. Proximity describes the closer structure used to repair it.
They should appear close enough that the reader can connect them without crowding or breaking the passage.
Yes. A link can appear too early, too late, or without enough local context to explain the route.
MIRENA can return the location record, distance matrix, regrouping plan, section plan, route repair, and final handoff.
Next route
Use the Entity Led Brief before drafting, or send a live asset into rewriting when definitions, attributes, examples, and routes have drifted apart.
Founder access is €20 per 30 days excluding VAT for one seat and one active MIRENA instance. OpenAI account rules, plan charges, model access, and usage limits remain separate.