The primary entity controls the asset
Supporting entities enter only when they deepen the approved page job.
Section level entity fit · Entity SEO
MIRENA maps the page job and entity hierarchy, defines each section job, matches supporting entities to the local question, keeps attributes and explanations close, checks the flow between sections, and routes deeper entities to the assets that own them.
Definition and evidence boundary
MIRENA does not front load every related entity. It introduces each one when the section needs that entity to answer, explain, compare, prove, or route.
Supporting entities enter only when they deepen the approved page job.
An entity belongs where its role is explained and its attributes can sit close.
Every supporting entity needs timing, explanation, source support, and a route or stopping point.
MIRENA internal workflow
The workflow prevents overloaded openings, scattered entities, unexplained mentions, mixed section jobs, distant attributes, and internal links that arrive without context.
MIRENA fixes the query, audience, completion event, source context, hierarchy, and one stable asset center.
Each H2 and H3 receives a local question, answer role, entity need, format, evidence need, and next route.
The entity map is filtered so each section receives only the entities it needs.
MIRENA keeps the entity, relationship, attributes, example, and source close enough to form one clear block.
Entities that appear too early, too late, too often, without explanation, or inside the wrong intent are marked.
The approved placements become heading notes, bridge copy, examples, links, rewrite actions, and hold states.
Eight integration roles
The entity helps explain what the primary concept is and how it differs.
The entity supplies a property, function, limit, input, output, or use case.
The entity creates criteria, contrast, fit, tradeoffs, or a decision frame.
The entity acts as an input, owner, stage, tool, blocker, output, or handoff.
The entity makes an abstract idea concrete through a grounded scenario.
The entity acts as a source, observation, record, screenshot, dataset, or proof.
The entity is needed to answer a real follow up question or objection.
The entity points to the sibling asset, support step, product path, or next workflow.
Eight integration review dimensions
Does the entity help answer the local question?
Does it appear after the reader has enough context and before it is needed?
Are the attributes, relationship, example, and source close to the mention?
Does the copy state the entity role and why it belongs?
Does the entity connect the previous point to the current section and next step?
Does the support entity deepen the page without competing with the primary entity?
Is the entity fact, role, relationship, or claim approved and visible?
Should the section explain the depth or link to the asset that owns it?
Eight integration repair actions
Place it in the section where its role is actually being explained.
Explain why the entity enters now and how it connects to the local question.
Keep the function, limit, example, or relationship close to the entity.
Use a comparison, process, checklist, example, question, or evidence block when prose hides the role.
Separate supporting entities that serve different intents or page jobs.
Reduce prominence when the entity adds little value or competes with the center.
Link to the approved asset that owns deeper explanation or the next task.
Stop when the entity, claim, relationship, or destination is not ready.
Examples
Search intent, lists, tables, People Also Ask, and passage retrieval are packed into the opening.
Define the snippet first, then introduce intent, formats, related questions, and retrieval in the sections where each is explained.
Attributes, hierarchy, links, schema, and Information Gain appear in one broad paragraph.
Place each supporting entity inside its own role: definition, placement, support, route, and structured consistency.
Owners, evidence, tools, outputs, and links appear before the sequence is established.
Introduce them as input, stage, gate, blocker, output, and handoff at the correct process step.
New support entities were added over time wherever space was available.
Rebuild section jobs, regroup the entity support, remove duplicates, and restore the cluster route.
Related workflows
Lists the approved entity network, attributes, relationships, weights, sections, and routes.
Provides the candidate support for each section.
Places related entities together inside one context.
Creates local proximity before integration checks purpose and timing.
Explains how the entities connect and in which direction.
Supplies the meaning that the section must carry.
Assigns primary and supporting entities to page zones.
Controls where the integrated entity appears across the asset.
Builds enough attributes, examples, comparisons, evidence, and routes around the center.
Determines how much supporting context the section needs.
Turns the approved section jobs and entity roles into writer instructions.
Receives the integration plan before drafting.
Ownership and production decisions
The entity directly supports the local answer and can be explained clearly.
The entity belongs to the same asset but a different local question.
Another approved page owns the deeper entity or task.
The entity is irrelevant, unsupported, duplicated, private, or outside source context.
Common mistakes
The opening should establish the center rather than carry the entire network.
The entity must support the specific section job.
The role and attributes should sit close to the entity.
Each section needs a distinct question and entity set.
The route should arrive when the reader is ready for the deeper task.
Supporting entities should deepen the center rather than replace it.
MIRENA outputs
Heading, local question, answer role, primary entity, supporting entities, format, and next route.
Review the routeEntity role, section fit, timing, proximity, explanation, source, salience risk, and owner.
Review the routeTransition, relationship statement, attributes, example, evidence, and expected reader value.
Review the routeOpening, H2, H3, paragraph, comparison, process, example, question, summary, or link position.
Review the routeSection jobs, entity roles, source notes, formats, bridge copy, examples, and internal routes.
Review the routeAccepted, held, rejected, blocked, and review needed placements with owners and next workflows.
Review the routeEntity SEO routes
Confirm the approved network, roles, attributes, relationships, weights, and routes.
Review the routeAssign the primary and supporting entities to high value and section level zones.
Review the routeAdd the context, examples, comparisons, evidence, and links the section needs.
Review the routeMove section jobs and entity roles into writer instructions before drafting begins.
Review the routeQuestions
It is the practice of placing entities in the section where their role strengthens the answer.
Co occurrence shows entities together. Integration checks whether they appear in the correct section with enough explanation and purpose.
Salience protects the main entity. Integration places supporting entities around that center.
No. The opening should establish the primary entity and only the support needed for the first answer.
Yes. A contextual route can extend the entity or relationship when another approved asset owns the depth.
MIRENA can return the section job record, entity matrix, bridge plan, placement plan, brief or rewrite insertions, and final handoff.
Next route
Use the Entity Led Brief before drafting, or route a live URL into rewriting when supporting entities already appear in the wrong sections.
Founder access is €20 per 30 days excluding VAT for one seat and one active MIRENA instance. OpenAI account rules, plan charges, model access, and usage limits remain separate.